SpringCloud Feign轉(zhuǎn)發(fā)請求頭(防止session失效)的解決方案
微服務(wù)開發(fā)中經(jīng)常有這樣的需求,公司自定義了通用的請求頭,需要在微服務(wù)的調(diào)用鏈中轉(zhuǎn)發(fā),比如在請求頭中加入了token,或者某個自定義的信息uniqueId,總之就是自定義的一個鍵值對的東東,A服務(wù)調(diào)用B服務(wù),B服務(wù)調(diào)用C服務(wù),這樣通用的東西如何讓他在一個調(diào)用鏈中不斷地傳遞下去呢?以A服務(wù)為例:
方案1
最傻的辦法,在程序中獲取,調(diào)用B的時候再轉(zhuǎn)發(fā),怎么獲取在Controller中國通過注解獲取,或者通過request對象獲取,這個不難,在請求B服務(wù)的時候,通過注解將值放進(jìn)去即可;簡代碼如下:
獲取:
@RequestMapping(value = "/api/test", method = RequestMethod.GET)
public String testFun(@RequestParam String name, @RequestHeader("uniqueId") String uniqueId) {
if(uniqueId == null ){
return "Must defined the uniqueId , it can not be null";
}
log.info(uniqueId, "begin testFun... ");
return uniqueId;
}
然后A使用Feign調(diào)用B服務(wù)的時候,傳過去:
@FeignClient(value = "DEMO-SERVICE")
public interface CallClient {
/**
* 訪問DEMO-SERVICE服務(wù)的/api/test接口,通過注解將logId傳遞給下游服務(wù)
*/
@RequestMapping(value = "/api/test", method = RequestMethod.GET)
String callApiTest(@RequestParam(value = "name") String name, @RequestHeader(value = "uniqueId") String uniqueId);
}
方案弊端:毫無疑問,這方案不好,因為對代碼有侵入,需要開發(fā)人員沒次手動的獲取和添加,因此舍棄
方案2
服務(wù)通過請求攔截器,在請求從A發(fā)送到B之后,在攔截器內(nèi)將自己需要的東東加到請求頭:
import com.intellif.log.LoggerUtilI;
import feign.RequestInterceptor;
import org.springframework.context.annotation.Bean;
import org.springframework.context.annotation.Configuration;
import org.springframework.web.context.request.RequestContextHolder;
import org.springframework.web.context.request.ServletRequestAttributes;
import javax.servlet.http.HttpServletRequest;
import java.util.Enumeration;
/**
* 自定義的請求頭處理類,處理服務(wù)發(fā)送時的請求頭;
* 將服務(wù)接收到的請求頭中的uniqueId和token字段取出來,并設(shè)置到新的請求頭里面去轉(zhuǎn)發(fā)給下游服務(wù)
* 比如A服務(wù)收到一個請求,請求頭里面包含uniqueId和token字段,A處理時會使用Feign客戶端調(diào)用B服務(wù)
* 那么uniqueId和token這兩個字段就會添加到請求頭中一并發(fā)給B服務(wù);
*
* @author mozping
* @version 1.0
* @date 2018/6/27 14:13
* @see FeignHeadConfiguration
* @since JDK1.8
*/
@Configuration
public class FeignHeadConfiguration {
private final LoggerUtilI logger = LoggerUtilI.getLogger(this.getClass().getName());
@Bean
public RequestInterceptor requestInterceptor() {
return requestTemplate -> {
ServletRequestAttributes attrs = (ServletRequestAttributes) RequestContextHolder.getRequestAttributes();
if (attrs != null) {
HttpServletRequest request = attrs.getRequest();
Enumeration<String> headerNames = request.getHeaderNames();
if (headerNames != null) {
while (headerNames.hasMoreElements()) {
String name = headerNames.nextElement();
String value = request.getHeader(name);
/**
* 遍歷請求頭里面的屬性字段,將logId和token添加到新的請求頭中轉(zhuǎn)發(fā)到下游服務(wù)
* */
if ("uniqueId".equalsIgnoreCase(name) || "token".equalsIgnoreCase(name)) {
logger.debug("添加自定義請求頭key:" + name + ",value:" + value);
requestTemplate.header(name, value);
} else {
logger.debug("FeignHeadConfiguration", "非自定義請求頭key:" + name + ",value:" + value + "不需要添加!");
}
}
} else {
logger.warn("FeignHeadConfiguration", "獲取請求頭失?。?);
}
}
};
}
}
網(wǎng)上很多關(guān)于這種方法的博文或者資料,大同小異,但是有一個問題,在開啟熔斷器之后,這里的attrs就是null,因為熔斷器默認(rèn)的隔離策略是thread,也就是線程隔離,實際上接收到的對象和這個在發(fā)送給B不是一個線程,怎么辦?有一個辦法,修改隔離策略hystrix.command.default.execution.isolation.strategy=SEMAPHORE,改為信號量的隔離模式,但是不推薦,因為thread是默認(rèn)的,而且要命的是信號量模式,熔斷器不生效,比如設(shè)置了熔斷時間hystrix.command.default.execution.isolation.semaphore.timeoutInMilliseconds=5000,五秒,如果B服務(wù)里面sleep了10秒,非得等到B執(zhí)行完畢再返回,因此這個方案也不可?。坏怯惺裁崔k法可以在默認(rèn)的Thread模式下讓攔截器拿到上游服務(wù)的請求頭?自定義策略:代碼如下:
import com.netflix.hystrix.HystrixThreadPoolKey;
import com.netflix.hystrix.HystrixThreadPoolProperties;
import com.netflix.hystrix.strategy.HystrixPlugins;
import com.netflix.hystrix.strategy.concurrency.HystrixConcurrencyStrategy;
import com.netflix.hystrix.strategy.concurrency.HystrixRequestVariable;
import com.netflix.hystrix.strategy.concurrency.HystrixRequestVariableLifecycle;
import com.netflix.hystrix.strategy.eventnotifier.HystrixEventNotifier;
import com.netflix.hystrix.strategy.executionhook.HystrixCommandExecutionHook;
import com.netflix.hystrix.strategy.metrics.HystrixMetricsPublisher;
import com.netflix.hystrix.strategy.properties.HystrixPropertiesStrategy;
import com.netflix.hystrix.strategy.properties.HystrixProperty;
import org.slf4j.Logger;
import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory;
import org.springframework.stereotype.Component;
import org.springframework.web.context.request.RequestAttributes;
import org.springframework.web.context.request.RequestContextHolder;
import java.util.concurrent.BlockingQueue;
import java.util.concurrent.Callable;
import java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor;
import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;
/**
* 自定義Feign的隔離策略;
* 在轉(zhuǎn)發(fā)Feign的請求頭的時候,如果開啟了Hystrix,Hystrix的默認(rèn)隔離策略是Thread(線程隔離策略),因此轉(zhuǎn)發(fā)攔截器內(nèi)是無法獲取到請求的請求頭信息的,可以修改默認(rèn)隔離策略為信號量模式:hystrix.command.default.execution.isolation.strategy=SEMAPHORE,這樣的話轉(zhuǎn)發(fā)線程和請求線程實際上是一個線程,這并不是最好的解決方法,信號量模式也不是官方最為推薦的隔離策略;另一個解決方法就是自定義Hystrix的隔離策略,思路是將現(xiàn)有的并發(fā)策略作為新并發(fā)策略的成員變量,在新并發(fā)策略中,返回現(xiàn)有并發(fā)策略的線程池、Queue;將策略加到Spring容器即可;
*
* @author mozping
* @version 1.0
* @date 2018/7/5 9:08
* @see FeignHystrixConcurrencyStrategyIntellif
* @since JDK1.8
*/
@Component
public class FeignHystrixConcurrencyStrategyIntellif extends HystrixConcurrencyStrategy {
private static final Logger log = LoggerFactory.getLogger(FeignHystrixConcurrencyStrategyIntellif.class);
private HystrixConcurrencyStrategy delegate;
public FeignHystrixConcurrencyStrategyIntellif() {
try {
this.delegate = HystrixPlugins.getInstance().getConcurrencyStrategy();
if (this.delegate instanceof FeignHystrixConcurrencyStrategyIntellif) {
// Welcome to singleton hell...
return;
}
HystrixCommandExecutionHook commandExecutionHook =
HystrixPlugins.getInstance().getCommandExecutionHook();
HystrixEventNotifier eventNotifier = HystrixPlugins.getInstance().getEventNotifier();
HystrixMetricsPublisher metricsPublisher = HystrixPlugins.getInstance().getMetricsPublisher();
HystrixPropertiesStrategy propertiesStrategy =
HystrixPlugins.getInstance().getPropertiesStrategy();
this.logCurrentStateOfHystrixPlugins(eventNotifier, metricsPublisher, propertiesStrategy);
HystrixPlugins.reset();
HystrixPlugins.getInstance().registerConcurrencyStrategy(this);
HystrixPlugins.getInstance().registerCommandExecutionHook(commandExecutionHook);
HystrixPlugins.getInstance().registerEventNotifier(eventNotifier);
HystrixPlugins.getInstance().registerMetricsPublisher(metricsPublisher);
HystrixPlugins.getInstance().registerPropertiesStrategy(propertiesStrategy);
} catch (Exception e) {
log.error("Failed to register Sleuth Hystrix Concurrency Strategy", e);
}
}
private void logCurrentStateOfHystrixPlugins(HystrixEventNotifier eventNotifier,
HystrixMetricsPublisher metricsPublisher, HystrixPropertiesStrategy propertiesStrategy) {
if (log.isDebugEnabled()) {
log.debug("Current Hystrix plugins configuration is [" + "concurrencyStrategy ["
+ this.delegate + "]," + "eventNotifier [" + eventNotifier + "]," + "metricPublisher ["
+ metricsPublisher + "]," + "propertiesStrategy [" + propertiesStrategy + "]," + "]");
log.debug("Registering Sleuth Hystrix Concurrency Strategy.");
}
}
@Override
public <T> Callable<T> wrapCallable(Callable<T> callable) {
RequestAttributes requestAttributes = RequestContextHolder.getRequestAttributes();
return new WrappedCallable<>(callable, requestAttributes);
}
@Override
public ThreadPoolExecutor getThreadPool(HystrixThreadPoolKey threadPoolKey,
HystrixProperty<Integer> corePoolSize, HystrixProperty<Integer> maximumPoolSize,
HystrixProperty<Integer> keepAliveTime, TimeUnit unit, BlockingQueue<Runnable> workQueue) {
return this.delegate.getThreadPool(threadPoolKey, corePoolSize, maximumPoolSize, keepAliveTime,
unit, workQueue);
}
@Override
public ThreadPoolExecutor getThreadPool(HystrixThreadPoolKey threadPoolKey,
HystrixThreadPoolProperties threadPoolProperties) {
return this.delegate.getThreadPool(threadPoolKey, threadPoolProperties);
}
@Override
public BlockingQueue<Runnable> getBlockingQueue(int maxQueueSize) {
return this.delegate.getBlockingQueue(maxQueueSize);
}
@Override
public <T> HystrixRequestVariable<T> getRequestVariable(HystrixRequestVariableLifecycle<T> rv) {
return this.delegate.getRequestVariable(rv);
}
static class WrappedCallable<T> implements Callable<T> {
private final Callable<T> target;
private final RequestAttributes requestAttributes;
public WrappedCallable(Callable<T> target, RequestAttributes requestAttributes) {
this.target = target;
this.requestAttributes = requestAttributes;
}
@Override
public T call() throws Exception {
try {
RequestContextHolder.setRequestAttributes(requestAttributes);
return target.call();
} finally {
RequestContextHolder.resetRequestAttributes();
}
}
}
}
然后使用默認(rèn)的熔斷器隔離策略,也可以在攔截器內(nèi)獲取到上游服務(wù)的請求頭信息了;
這里參考的博客,感謝這位大牛:https://blog.csdn.net/Crystalqy/article/details/79083857
到此這篇關(guān)于SpringCloud Feign轉(zhuǎn)發(fā)請求頭(防止session失效)的解決方案的文章就介紹到這了,更多相關(guān)SpringCloud Feign轉(zhuǎn)發(fā)請求頭內(nèi)容請搜索腳本之家以前的文章或繼續(xù)瀏覽下面的相關(guān)文章希望大家以后多多支持腳本之家!
相關(guān)文章
詳解Java阻塞隊列(BlockingQueue)的實現(xiàn)原理
這篇文章主要介紹了詳解Java阻塞隊列(BlockingQueue)的實現(xiàn)原理,阻塞隊列是Java util.concurrent包下重要的數(shù)據(jù)結(jié)構(gòu),有興趣的可以了解一下2017-06-06
一起來學(xué)習(xí)Java IO的轉(zhuǎn)化流
這篇文章主要為大家詳細(xì)介紹了Java IO的轉(zhuǎn)化流,文中示例代碼介紹的非常詳細(xì),具有一定的參考價值,感興趣的小伙伴們可以參考一下,希望能夠給你帶來幫助2022-03-03
springboot使用EMQX(MQTT協(xié)議)的實現(xiàn)
最近由于iot越來越火, 物聯(lián)網(wǎng)的需求越來越多, 那么理所當(dāng)然的使用mqtt的場景也就越來越多,本文主要介紹了springboot使用EMQX(MQTT協(xié)議)的實現(xiàn),感興趣的可以了解一下2023-10-10
Java陷阱之a(chǎn)ssert關(guān)鍵字詳解
這篇文章詳細(xì)介紹了Java陷阱之a(chǎn)ssert關(guān)鍵字,有需要的朋友可以參考一下2013-09-09
使用開源項目JAVAE2 進(jìn)行視頻格式轉(zhuǎn)換
這篇文章主要介紹了使用開源項目JAVAE 進(jìn)行視頻格式轉(zhuǎn)換,幫助大家更好的利用Java處理視頻,完成自身需求,感興趣的朋友可以了解下2020-11-11
實體類使用@Builder,導(dǎo)致@ConfigurationProperties注入屬性失敗問題
這篇文章主要介紹了實體類使用@Builder,導(dǎo)致@ConfigurationProperties注入屬性失敗問題,具有很好的參考價值,希望對大家有所幫助,如有錯誤或未考慮完全的地方,望不吝賜教2023-12-12

