Spring事務(wù)處理Transactional,鎖同步和并發(fā)線程
Spring事務(wù)傳播機(jī)制和數(shù)據(jù)庫隔離級別
在標(biāo)準(zhǔn)SQL規(guī)范中定義了4個(gè)事務(wù)隔離級別,不同隔離級別對事務(wù)處理不同 。
- 未授權(quán)讀?。≧ead Uncommitted): 也稱 未提交讀。允許臟讀取但不允許更新丟失,如果一個(gè)事務(wù)已經(jīng)開始寫數(shù)據(jù)則另外一個(gè)數(shù)據(jù)則不允許同時(shí)進(jìn)行寫操作但允許其他事務(wù)讀此行數(shù)據(jù)。該隔離級別可以通過 “排他寫鎖”實(shí)現(xiàn)。事務(wù)隔離的最低級別,僅可保證不讀取物理損壞的數(shù)據(jù)。與READ COMMITTED 隔離級相反,它允許讀取已經(jīng)被其它用戶修改但尚未提交確定的數(shù)據(jù)。
- 授權(quán)讀?。≧ead Committed): 也稱提交 讀。允許不可重復(fù)讀取但不允許臟讀取。這可以通過“瞬間共享讀鎖”和“排他寫鎖”實(shí)現(xiàn),讀取數(shù)據(jù)的事務(wù)允許其他事務(wù)繼續(xù)訪問該行數(shù)據(jù),但是未提交寫事務(wù)將 會(huì)禁止其他事務(wù)訪問該行。SQL Server 默認(rèn)的級別。在此隔離級下,SELECT 命令不會(huì)返回尚未提交(Committed) 的數(shù)據(jù),也不能返回臟數(shù)據(jù)。
- 可重復(fù)讀?。≧epeatable Read): 禁止 不可重復(fù)讀取和臟讀取。但是有時(shí)可能出現(xiàn)幻影數(shù)據(jù),這可以通過“共享讀鎖”和“排他寫鎖”實(shí)現(xiàn),讀取數(shù)據(jù)事務(wù)將會(huì)禁止寫事務(wù)(但允許讀事務(wù)),寫事務(wù)則禁 止任何其他事務(wù)。在此隔離級下,用SELECT 命令讀取的數(shù)據(jù)在整個(gè)命令執(zhí)行過程中不會(huì)被更改。此選項(xiàng)會(huì)影響系統(tǒng)的效能,非必要情況最好不用此隔離級。
- 串行(Serializable): 也稱可串行讀。提 供嚴(yán)格的事務(wù)隔離,它要求事務(wù)序列化執(zhí)行,事務(wù)只能一個(gè)接著一個(gè)地執(zhí)行,但不能并發(fā)執(zhí)行。如果僅僅通過“行級鎖”是無法實(shí)現(xiàn)事務(wù)序列化的,必須通過其他機(jī) 制保證新插入的數(shù)據(jù)不會(huì)被剛執(zhí)行查詢操作事務(wù)訪問到。事務(wù)隔離的最高級別,事務(wù)之間完全隔離。如果事務(wù)在可串行讀隔離級別上運(yùn)行,則可以保證任何并發(fā)重疊 事務(wù)均是串行的。
| 隔離級別 | 更新丟失 | 臟讀取 | 重復(fù)讀取 | 幻讀 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 未授權(quán)讀取 | N | Y | Y | Y |
| 授權(quán)讀取 | N | N | Y | Y |
| 可重復(fù)讀取 | N | N | N | Y |
| 串行 | N | N | N | N |
Spring在TransactionDefinition接口中規(guī)定了7種類型的事務(wù)傳播行為,它們規(guī)定了事務(wù)方法和事務(wù)方法發(fā)生嵌套調(diào)用時(shí)事務(wù)如何進(jìn)行傳播:
package org.springframework.transaction.annotation;
import org.springframework.transaction.TransactionDefinition;
/**
* Enumeration that represents transaction propagation behaviors for use
* with the {@link Transactional} annotation, corresponding to the
* {@link TransactionDefinition} interface.
*
* @author Colin Sampaleanu
* @author Juergen Hoeller
* @since 1.2
*/
public enum Propagation {
/**
* Support a current transaction, create a new one if none exists.
* Analogous to EJB transaction attribute of the same name.
* <p>This is the default setting of a transaction annotation.
*/
REQUIRED(TransactionDefinition.PROPAGATION_REQUIRED),
/**
* Support a current transaction, execute non-transactionally if none exists.
* Analogous to EJB transaction attribute of the same name.
* <p>Note: For transaction managers with transaction synchronization,
* PROPAGATION_SUPPORTS is slightly different from no transaction at all,
* as it defines a transaction scope that synchronization will apply for.
* As a consequence, the same resources (JDBC Connection, Hibernate Session, etc)
* will be shared for the entire specified scope. Note that this depends on
* the actual synchronization configuration of the transaction manager.
* @see org.springframework.transaction.support.AbstractPlatformTransactionManager#setTransactionSynchronization
*/
SUPPORTS(TransactionDefinition.PROPAGATION_SUPPORTS),
/**
* Support a current transaction, throw an exception if none exists.
* Analogous to EJB transaction attribute of the same name.
*/
MANDATORY(TransactionDefinition.PROPAGATION_MANDATORY),
/**
* Create a new transaction, and suspend the current transaction if one exists.
* Analogous to the EJB transaction attribute of the same name.
* <p>Note: Actual transaction suspension will not work out-of-the-box on
* all transaction managers. This in particular applies to JtaTransactionManager,
* which requires the {@code javax.transaction.TransactionManager} to be
* made available it to it (which is server-specific in standard J2EE).
* @see org.springframework.transaction.jta.JtaTransactionManager#setTransactionManager
*/
REQUIRES_NEW(TransactionDefinition.PROPAGATION_REQUIRES_NEW),
/**
* Execute non-transactionally, suspend the current transaction if one exists.
* Analogous to EJB transaction attribute of the same name.
* <p>Note: Actual transaction suspension will not work on out-of-the-box
* on all transaction managers. This in particular applies to JtaTransactionManager,
* which requires the {@code javax.transaction.TransactionManager} to be
* made available it to it (which is server-specific in standard J2EE).
* @see org.springframework.transaction.jta.JtaTransactionManager#setTransactionManager
*/
NOT_SUPPORTED(TransactionDefinition.PROPAGATION_NOT_SUPPORTED),
/**
* Execute non-transactionally, throw an exception if a transaction exists.
* Analogous to EJB transaction attribute of the same name.
*/
NEVER(TransactionDefinition.PROPAGATION_NEVER),
/**
* Execute within a nested transaction if a current transaction exists,
* behave like PROPAGATION_REQUIRED else. There is no analogous feature in EJB.
* <p>Note: Actual creation of a nested transaction will only work on specific
* transaction managers. Out of the box, this only applies to the JDBC
* DataSourceTransactionManager when working on a JDBC 3.0 driver.
* Some JTA providers might support nested transactions as well.
* @see org.springframework.jdbc.datasource.DataSourceTransactionManager
通過創(chuàng)建Savepoint實(shí)現(xiàn)嵌套事務(wù),達(dá)到內(nèi)層事務(wù)若拋出異常(unchecked exception)則回滾到savepoint處,但不影響外層事務(wù);外層事務(wù)的回滾會(huì)一起回滾內(nèi)層事務(wù);
*/
NESTED(TransactionDefinition.PROPAGATION_NESTED);
private final int value;
Propagation(int value) { this.value = value; }
public int value() { return this.value; }
}
/*
* Copyright 2002-2012 the original author or authors.
*
* Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
* you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
* You may obtain a copy of the License at
*
* http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
*
* Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
* distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
* WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
* See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
* limitations under the License.
*/
package org.springframework.transaction;
import java.sql.Connection;
/**
* Interface that defines Spring-compliant transaction properties.
* Based on the propagation behavior definitions analogous to EJB CMT attributes.
*
* <p>Note that isolation level and timeout settings will not get applied unless
* an actual new transaction gets started. As only {@link #PROPAGATION_REQUIRED},
* {@link #PROPAGATION_REQUIRES_NEW} and {@link #PROPAGATION_NESTED} can cause
* that, it usually doesn't make sense to specify those settings in other cases.
* Furthermore, be aware that not all transaction managers will support those
* advanced features and thus might throw corresponding exceptions when given
* non-default values.
*
* <p>The {@link #isReadOnly() read-only flag} applies to any transaction context,
* whether backed by an actual resource transaction or operating non-transactionally
* at the resource level. In the latter case, the flag will only apply to managed
* resources within the application, such as a Hibernate {@code Session}.
*
* @author Juergen Hoeller
* @since 08.05.2003
* @see PlatformTransactionManager#getTransaction(TransactionDefinition)
* @see org.springframework.transaction.support.DefaultTransactionDefinition
* @see org.springframework.transaction.interceptor.TransactionAttribute
*/
public interface TransactionDefinition {
/**
* Support a current transaction; create a new one if none exists.
* Analogous to the EJB transaction attribute of the same name.
* <p>This is typically the default setting of a transaction definition,
* and typically defines a transaction synchronization scope.
*/
int PROPAGATION_REQUIRED = 0;
/**
* Support a current transaction; execute non-transactionally if none exists.
* Analogous to the EJB transaction attribute of the same name.
* <p><b>NOTE:</b> For transaction managers with transaction synchronization,
* {@code PROPAGATION_SUPPORTS} is slightly different from no transaction
* at all, as it defines a transaction scope that synchronization might apply to.
* As a consequence, the same resources (a JDBC {@code Connection}, a
* Hibernate {@code Session}, etc) will be shared for the entire specified
* scope. Note that the exact behavior depends on the actual synchronization
* configuration of the transaction manager!
* <p>In general, use {@code PROPAGATION_SUPPORTS} with care! In particular, do
* not rely on {@code PROPAGATION_REQUIRED} or {@code PROPAGATION_REQUIRES_NEW}
* <i>within</i> a {@code PROPAGATION_SUPPORTS} scope (which may lead to
* synchronization conflicts at runtime). If such nesting is unavoidable, make sure
* to configure your transaction manager appropriately (typically switching to
* "synchronization on actual transaction").
* @see org.springframework.transaction.support.AbstractPlatformTransactionManager#setTransactionSynchronization
* @see org.springframework.transaction.support.AbstractPlatformTransactionManager#SYNCHRONIZATION_ON_ACTUAL_TRANSACTION
*/
int PROPAGATION_SUPPORTS = 1;
/**
* Support a current transaction; throw an exception if no current transaction
* exists. Analogous to the EJB transaction attribute of the same name.
* <p>Note that transaction synchronization within a {@code PROPAGATION_MANDATORY}
* scope will always be driven by the surrounding transaction.
*/
int PROPAGATION_MANDATORY = 2;
/**
* Create a new transaction, suspending the current transaction if one exists.
* Analogous to the EJB transaction attribute of the same name.
* <p><b>NOTE:</b> Actual transaction suspension will not work out-of-the-box
* on all transaction managers. This in particular applies to
* {@link org.springframework.transaction.jta.JtaTransactionManager},
* which requires the {@code javax.transaction.TransactionManager}
* to be made available it to it (which is server-specific in standard J2EE).
* <p>A {@code PROPAGATION_REQUIRES_NEW} scope always defines its own
* transaction synchronizations. Existing synchronizations will be suspended
* and resumed appropriately.
* @see org.springframework.transaction.jta.JtaTransactionManager#setTransactionManager
*/
int PROPAGATION_REQUIRES_NEW = 3;
/**
* Do not support a current transaction; rather always execute non-transactionally.
* Analogous to the EJB transaction attribute of the same name.
* <p><b>NOTE:</b> Actual transaction suspension will not work out-of-the-box
* on all transaction managers. This in particular applies to
* {@link org.springframework.transaction.jta.JtaTransactionManager},
* which requires the {@code javax.transaction.TransactionManager}
* to be made available it to it (which is server-specific in standard J2EE).
* <p>Note that transaction synchronization is <i>not</i> available within a
* {@code PROPAGATION_NOT_SUPPORTED} scope. Existing synchronizations
* will be suspended and resumed appropriately.
* @see org.springframework.transaction.jta.JtaTransactionManager#setTransactionManager
*/
int PROPAGATION_NOT_SUPPORTED = 4;
/**
* Do not support a current transaction; throw an exception if a current transaction
* exists. Analogous to the EJB transaction attribute of the same name.
* <p>Note that transaction synchronization is <i>not</i> available within a
* {@code PROPAGATION_NEVER} scope.
*/
int PROPAGATION_NEVER = 5;
/**
* Execute within a nested transaction if a current transaction exists,
* behave like {@link #PROPAGATION_REQUIRED} else. There is no analogous
* feature in EJB.
* <p><b>NOTE:</b> Actual creation of a nested transaction will only work on
* specific transaction managers. Out of the box, this only applies to the JDBC
* {@link org.springframework.jdbc.datasource.DataSourceTransactionManager}
* when working on a JDBC 3.0 driver. Some JTA providers might support
* nested transactions as well.
* @see org.springframework.jdbc.datasource.DataSourceTransactionManager
*/
int PROPAGATION_NESTED = 6;
/**
* Use the default isolation level of the underlying datastore.
* All other levels correspond to the JDBC isolation levels.
* @see java.sql.Connection
*/
int ISOLATION_DEFAULT = -1;
/**
* Indicates that dirty reads, non-repeatable reads and phantom reads
* can occur.
* <p>This level allows a row changed by one transaction to be read by another
* transaction before any changes in that row have been committed (a "dirty read").
* If any of the changes are rolled back, the second transaction will have
* retrieved an invalid row.
* @see java.sql.Connection#TRANSACTION_READ_UNCOMMITTED
*/
int ISOLATION_READ_UNCOMMITTED = Connection.TRANSACTION_READ_UNCOMMITTED;
/**
* Indicates that dirty reads are prevented; non-repeatable reads and
* phantom reads can occur.
* <p>This level only prohibits a transaction from reading a row
* with uncommitted changes in it.
* @see java.sql.Connection#TRANSACTION_READ_COMMITTED
*/
int ISOLATION_READ_COMMITTED = Connection.TRANSACTION_READ_COMMITTED;
/**
* Indicates that dirty reads and non-repeatable reads are prevented;
* phantom reads can occur.
* <p>This level prohibits a transaction from reading a row with uncommitted changes
* in it, and it also prohibits the situation where one transaction reads a row,
* a second transaction alters the row, and the first transaction re-reads the row,
* getting different values the second time (a "non-repeatable read").
* @see java.sql.Connection#TRANSACTION_REPEATABLE_READ
*/
int ISOLATION_REPEATABLE_READ = Connection.TRANSACTION_REPEATABLE_READ;
/**
* Indicates that dirty reads, non-repeatable reads and phantom reads
* are prevented.
* <p>This level includes the prohibitions in {@link #ISOLATION_REPEATABLE_READ}
* and further prohibits the situation where one transaction reads all rows that
* satisfy a {@code WHERE} condition, a second transaction inserts a row
* that satisfies that {@code WHERE} condition, and the first transaction
* re-reads for the same condition, retrieving the additional "phantom" row
* in the second read.
* @see java.sql.Connection#TRANSACTION_SERIALIZABLE
*/
int ISOLATION_SERIALIZABLE = Connection.TRANSACTION_SERIALIZABLE;
/**
* Use the default timeout of the underlying transaction system,
* or none if timeouts are not supported.
*/
int TIMEOUT_DEFAULT = -1;
/**
* Return the propagation behavior.
* <p>Must return one of the {@code PROPAGATION_XXX} constants
* defined on {@link TransactionDefinition this interface}.
* @return the propagation behavior
* @see #PROPAGATION_REQUIRED
* @see org.springframework.transaction.support.TransactionSynchronizationManager#isActualTransactionActive()
*/
int getPropagationBehavior();
/**
* Return the isolation level.
* <p>Must return one of the {@code ISOLATION_XXX} constants
* defined on {@link TransactionDefinition this interface}.
* <p>Only makes sense in combination with {@link #PROPAGATION_REQUIRED}
* or {@link #PROPAGATION_REQUIRES_NEW}.
* <p>Note that a transaction manager that does not support custom isolation levels
* will throw an exception when given any other level than {@link #ISOLATION_DEFAULT}.
* @return the isolation level
*/
int getIsolationLevel();
/**
* Return the transaction timeout.
* <p>Must return a number of seconds, or {@link #TIMEOUT_DEFAULT}.
* <p>Only makes sense in combination with {@link #PROPAGATION_REQUIRED}
* or {@link #PROPAGATION_REQUIRES_NEW}.
* <p>Note that a transaction manager that does not support timeouts will throw
* an exception when given any other timeout than {@link #TIMEOUT_DEFAULT}.
* @return the transaction timeout
*/
int getTimeout();
/**
* Return whether to optimize as a read-only transaction.
* <p>The read-only flag applies to any transaction context, whether
* backed by an actual resource transaction
* ({@link #PROPAGATION_REQUIRED}/{@link #PROPAGATION_REQUIRES_NEW}) or
* operating non-transactionally at the resource level
* ({@link #PROPAGATION_SUPPORTS}). In the latter case, the flag will
* only apply to managed resources within the application, such as a
* Hibernate {@code Session}.
<< * <p>This just serves as a hint for the actual transaction subsystem;
* it will <i>not necessarily</i> cause failure of write access attempts.
* A transaction manager which cannot interpret the read-only hint will
* <i>not</i> throw an exception when asked for a read-only transaction.
* @return {@code true} if the transaction is to be optimized as read-only
* @see org.springframework.transaction.support.TransactionSynchronization#beforeCommit(boolean)
* @see org.springframework.transaction.support.TransactionSynchronizationManager#isCurrentTransactionReadOnly()
*/
boolean isReadOnly();
/**
* Return the name of this transaction. Can be {@code null}.
* <p>This will be used as the transaction name to be shown in a
* transaction monitor, if applicable (for example, WebLogic's).
* <p>In case of Spring's declarative transactions, the exposed name will be
* the {@code fully-qualified class name + "." + method name} (by default).
* @return the name of this transaction
* @see org.springframework.transaction.interceptor.TransactionAspectSupport
* @see org.springframework.transaction.support.TransactionSynchronizationManager#getCurrentTransactionName()
*/
String getName();
}
PROPAGATION_REQUIRES_NEW :
啟動(dòng)一個(gè)新的, 不依賴于環(huán)境的 "內(nèi)部" 事務(wù).
這個(gè)事務(wù)將被完全 commited 或 rolled back 而不依賴于外部事務(wù), 它擁有自己的隔離范圍, 自己的鎖, 等等. 當(dāng)內(nèi)部事務(wù)開始執(zhí)行時(shí), 外部事務(wù)將被掛起, 內(nèi)務(wù)事務(wù)結(jié)束時(shí), 外部事務(wù)將繼續(xù)執(zhí)行.
PROPAGATION_NESTED :
如果外部事務(wù) commit, 嵌套事務(wù)也會(huì)被 commit;
如果外部事務(wù) roll back, 嵌套事務(wù)也會(huì)被 roll back 。
開始一個(gè) "嵌套的" 事務(wù), 它是已經(jīng)存在事務(wù)的一個(gè)真正的子事務(wù). 嵌套事務(wù)開始執(zhí)行時(shí), 它將取得一個(gè) savepoint. 如果這個(gè)嵌套事務(wù)失敗, 我們將回滾到此 savepoint. 嵌套事務(wù)是外部事務(wù)的一部分, 只有外部事務(wù)結(jié)束后它才會(huì)被提交.
代碼例子:
@Transactional(propagation=Propagation.NESTED)
@Transactional(propagation=Propagation.PROPAGATION_REQUIRES_NEW)
ServiceA{
@Autowired
ServiceB serviceB;
@Transactional(propagation=Propagation.NESTED)
public void method1(){
serviceB.method2();
int i = 1/0;
}
}
ServiceB{
@Transactional(propagation=Propagation.NESTED)
public void method2(){
xxxxxx
}
}
因?yàn)閙ethod1使用 @Transactional(propagation=Propagation.NESTED),當(dāng)執(zhí)行method1時(shí),會(huì)拋出異常,method2()也會(huì)被回滾;
如果method2()用PROPAGATION_REQUIRES_NEW:
ServiceB{
@Transactional(propagation=Propagation.PROPAGATION_REQUIRES_NEW)
public void method2(){
xxxxxx
}
}
那么method2不會(huì)因?yàn)閙ethod1拋出異常而回滾。
不管是什么類型的嵌套事務(wù),一個(gè)線程只有一個(gè)事務(wù),線程結(jié)束的時(shí)候才提交事務(wù),包括嵌套事務(wù),即使嵌套事務(wù)是REQUIRES_NEW,也不是嵌套事務(wù)的方法結(jié)束就提交事務(wù)的,一定是等到外部事務(wù)方法結(jié)束,整個(gè)線程結(jié)束才一起提交的。
在相同線程中進(jìn)行相互嵌套調(diào)用的事務(wù)方法工作于相同的事務(wù)中。如果這些相互嵌套調(diào)用的方法工作在不同的線程中,則不同線程下的事務(wù)方法工作在獨(dú)立的事務(wù)中。
而鎖存在于事務(wù)里,鎖的生命周期也是一個(gè)線程,在一個(gè)線程里可多次取得同一個(gè)鎖。
如果事務(wù)加在外部方法A,在內(nèi)部方法里面有synchronized代碼塊B,那么當(dāng)B執(zhí)行完時(shí),事務(wù)還未提交,其他線程進(jìn)入synchronized代碼塊B后,讀取的庫存數(shù)據(jù)不是最新的。
以上就是本文的全部內(nèi)容,希望對大家的學(xué)習(xí)有所幫助,也希望大家多多支持腳本之家。
相關(guān)文章
Java中的ArrayList.trimToSize()方法詳解
這篇文章主要介紹了Java中的ArrayList.trimToSize()方法詳解,前幾天看了Java?ArrayList,沒有明白trimToSize()這個(gè)方法是什么意思,所以看了一下源碼并且debug一下自己的一個(gè)例子,明白了其中的含義,需要的朋友可以參考下2023-11-11
java Socket編程實(shí)現(xiàn)I/O多路復(fù)用的示例
本文主要介紹了java Socket編程實(shí)現(xiàn)I/O多路復(fù)用的示例,文中通過示例代碼介紹的非常詳細(xì),對大家的學(xué)習(xí)或者工作具有一定的參考學(xué)習(xí)價(jià)值,需要的朋友們下面隨著小編來一起學(xué)習(xí)學(xué)習(xí)吧2023-09-09
SpringBoot多種自定義錯(cuò)誤頁面方式小結(jié)
這篇文章主要介紹了SpringBoot多種自定義錯(cuò)誤頁面方式小結(jié),具有很好的參考價(jià)值,希望對大家有所幫助。如有錯(cuò)誤或未考慮完全的地方,望不吝賜教2021-11-11
springboot+thymeleaf打包成jar后找不到靜態(tài)資源的坑及解決
這篇文章主要介紹了springboot+thymeleaf打包成jar后找不到靜態(tài)資源的坑及解決,具有很好的參考價(jià)值,希望對大家有所幫助。如有錯(cuò)誤或未考慮完全的地方,望不吝賜教2021-11-11
SpringBoot實(shí)現(xiàn)登錄攔截的示例代碼
如果我們不進(jìn)行登錄攔截的話,即使我們跳過登錄頁面直接去訪問任意一個(gè)頁面也能訪問成功,那么登錄功能就沒有意義,同時(shí)也會(huì)存在安全問題,本文就來介紹一下SpringBoot登錄攔截,具有一定的參考價(jià)值,感興趣的可以了解一下2023-09-09
SpringAOP切入點(diǎn)規(guī)范及獲取方法參數(shù)的實(shí)現(xiàn)
這篇文章主要介紹了SpringAOP切入點(diǎn)規(guī)范及獲取方法參數(shù),具有很好的參考價(jià)值,希望對大家有所幫助。如有錯(cuò)誤或未考慮完全的地方,望不吝賜教2021-06-06
如何寫好一個(gè)Spring組件的實(shí)現(xiàn)步驟
這篇文章主要介紹了如何寫好一個(gè)Spring組件的實(shí)現(xiàn)步驟,文中通過示例代碼介紹的非常詳細(xì),對大家的學(xué)習(xí)或者工作具有一定的參考學(xué)習(xí)價(jià)值,需要的朋友們下面隨著小編來一起學(xué)習(xí)學(xué)習(xí)吧2020-06-06
RocketMQ?broker?消息投遞流程處理PULL_MESSAGE請求解析
這篇文章主要為大家介紹了RocketMQ?broker?消息投遞流程處理PULL_MESSAGE請求源碼解析,有需要的朋友可以借鑒參考下,希望能夠有所幫助,祝大家多多進(jìn)步,早日升職加薪2023-04-04

