欧美bbbwbbbw肥妇,免费乱码人妻系列日韩,一级黄片

.NET某消防物聯(lián)網(wǎng)后臺服務(wù)內(nèi)存泄漏分析

 更新時(shí)間：2022年06月02日 16:26:31   作者：一線碼農(nóng)  
這篇文章主要為大家介紹了.NET某消防物聯(lián)網(wǎng)后臺服務(wù)內(nèi)存泄漏分析，有需要的朋友可以借鑒參考下，希望能夠有所幫助，祝大家多多進(jìn)步，早日升職加薪

一：背景

1. 講故事

去年十月份有位朋友從微信找到我，說他的程序內(nèi)存要炸掉了。。。截圖如下：

時(shí)間有點(diǎn)久，圖片都被清理了，不過有點(diǎn)諷刺的是，自己的程序本身就是做監(jiān)控的，結(jié)果自己出了問題，太尷尬了??????

二：Windbg 分析

1. 托管還是非托管

這個(gè)是甄別內(nèi)存問題的第一步，通過 !address -summary 和 !eeheap -gc 兩個(gè)命令基本就可以斷定。

0:000> !address -summary                             
Mapping file section regions...
Mapping module regions...
Mapping PEB regions...
Mapping TEB and stack regions...
Mapping heap regions...
Mapping page heap regions...
Mapping other regions...
Mapping stack trace database regions...
Mapping activation context regions...
--- Usage Summary ---------------- RgnCount ----------- Total Size -------- %ofBusy %ofTotal
Free                                    237     7ffc`1e222000 ( 127.985 TB)           99.99%
<unknown>                               594        3`b9b20000 (  14.901 GB)  95.96%    0.01%
Heap                                    370        0`12a2a000 ( 298.164 MB)   1.88%    0.00%
Image                                  1248        0`0ee5a000 ( 238.352 MB)   1.50%    0.00%
Stack                                   315        0`06780000 ( 103.500 MB)   0.65%    0.00%
Other                                    13        0`001d7000 (   1.840 MB)   0.01%    0.00%
TEB                                     105        0`000d2000 ( 840.000 kB)   0.01%    0.00%
PEB                                       1        0`00001000 (   4.000 kB)   0.00%    0.00%
--- Type Summary (for busy) ------ RgnCount ----------- Total Size -------- %ofBusy %ofTotal
MEM_PRIVATE                            1178        3`ce03d000 (  15.219 GB)  98.00%    0.01%
MEM_IMAGE                              1409        0`0f6fd000 ( 246.988 MB)   1.55%    0.00%
MEM_MAPPED                               59        0`04694000 (  70.578 MB)   0.44%    0.00%
--- State Summary ---------------- RgnCount ----------- Total Size -------- %ofBusy %ofTotal
MEM_FREE                                237     7ffc`1e222000 ( 127.985 TB)           99.99%
MEM_COMMIT                             2326        3`c7543000 (  15.115 GB)  97.33%    0.01%
MEM_RESERVE                             320        0`1a88b000 ( 424.543 MB)   2.67%    0.00%
0:000> !eeheap -gc
Number of GC Heaps: 1
generation 0 starts at 0x0000009902B57670
generation 1 starts at 0x0000009902A56810
generation 2 starts at 0x00000095318C1000
ephemeral segment allocation context: (0x0000009902D724A8, 0x0000009902D724C0)
         segment             begin         allocated         committed    allocated size    committed size
...
00000098FFBE0000  00000098FFBE1000  0000009902D724A8  0000009902D7D000  0x31914a8(51975336)  0x319c000(52019200)
Large object heap starts at 0x00000095418C1000
         segment             begin         allocated         committed    allocated size    committed size
00000095418C0000  00000095418C1000  00000095475D8D98  00000095475D9000  0x5d17d98(97615256)  0x5d18000(97615872)
Total Allocated Size:              Size: 0x398e6cbc8 (15450164168) bytes.
Total Committed Size:              Size: 0x398e7b000 (15450222592) bytes.
------------------------------
GC Allocated Heap Size:    Size: 0x398e6cbc8 (15450164168) bytes.
GC Committed Heap Size:    Size: 0x398e7b000 (15450222592) bytes.

從輸出信息看，好家伙。。。進(jìn)程提交內(nèi)存是 15G, 托管堆差不多也是 15G，這就說明當(dāng)前是相對簡單的 托管內(nèi)存泄漏。

2. 到底是什么在泄漏

要想知道到底是什么在泄漏，可以先到托管堆上看看有沒有什么異常的對象，使用 !dumpheap -stat 命令。

0:000> !dumpheap -stat
Statistics:
              MT    Count    TotalSize Class Name
...
00007ff8815d0f88  7260233    290409320 System.Collections.ArrayList
00007ff8815e6830  7313696    326240826 System.String
000000952fbbd2b0 12141398    509369998      Free
00007ff880685cf0  7254983    928637824 System.Diagnostics.ProcessInfo
00007ff88065f7d0  7256845   2031916600 System.Diagnostics.Process
00007ff8815e6ea8  7391338   2230744600 System.Object[]
00007ff88068fa70 186800748   8966435904 System.Diagnostics.ThreadInfo

從卦象上來看，真的太奇怪了，如果大家了解 Process 類，應(yīng)該知道 ProcessInfo 和 ThreadInfo 都是掛在 Process 下的，而且 ThreadInfo 對象高達(dá) 1.8億，真的太????了，看樣子程序是在不斷的做 Process.Start 操作吧。

接下來要探究的問題是 ThreadInfo 到底正在被誰持有？？？ 可以挑幾個(gè)看看它們的 !gcroot， 首尾法查了幾個(gè)，都是沒有引用根，如下所示：

0:000> !gcroot 0000009531e8f760
Found 0 unique roots (run '!GCRoot -all' to see all roots).
0:000> !gcroot 0000009531e8f670 
Found 0 unique roots (run '!GCRoot -all' to see all roots).
0:000> !gcroot 0000009531e8f378
Found 0 unique roots (run '!GCRoot -all' to see all roots).

3. 無引用根為什么不被回收

既然對象沒有引用根，為什么 GC 不回收它呢？ 這里就需要談經(jīng)驗(yàn)了，在我之前分析的很多關(guān)于內(nèi)存泄漏 的dump中，我都是從 生產(chǎn)端 找問題，貌似還沒有出現(xiàn)一個(gè)從 消費(fèi)端 找問題的案例，參考模型如下：

生產(chǎn)者既然沒問題，那消費(fèi)端能有什么問題呢？大家可以想一想，托管堆的消費(fèi)端起碼有兩個(gè)角色。

  • GC
  • Finalizer 線程

GC 肯定是不會(huì)出問題的,那就只能懷疑 Finalizer 線程出了什么問題，可以用 !t 命令把所有線程調(diào)出來看看。

0:000> !t
ThreadCount:      9566
UnstartedThread:  0
BackgroundThread: 88
PendingThread:    0
DeadThread:       9471
Hosted Runtime:   no
                                                                                                        Lock  
       ID OSID ThreadOBJ           State GC Mode     GC Alloc Context                  Domain           Count Apt Exception
   0    1 40e18 000000952fbdfe50    26020 Preemptive  0000000000000000:0000000000000000 000000952fbd2e40 0     STA 
   2    2 41ce8 000000952fc0e4d0    2b220 Preemptive  0000000000000000:0000000000000000 000000952fbd2e40 0     MTA (Finalizer) 
   4    4 41cb4 000000954c324970    27220 Preemptive  0000000000000000:0000000000000000 000000952fbd2e40 0     STA 
   5    5 41cb8 000000954c36d1e0  2027220 Preemptive  0000000000000000:0000000000000000 000000952fbd2e40 0     STA 
   6    6 41c58 000000954c33f070  2027220 Preemptive  0000000000000000:0000000000000000 000000952fbd2e40 0     STA 
   7    7 41c38 000000954c33f840    27220 Preemptive  0000000000000000:0000000000000000 000000952fbd2e40 0     STA 
   8    8 41e0c 000000954c333580    27220 Preemptive  0000000000000000:0000000000000000 000000952fbd2e40 0     STA 
   9    9 41e2c 000000954c354440    27220 Preemptive  0000000000000000:0000000000000000 000000952fbd2e40 0     STA 
  10   10 41f24 000000954c355840    27220 Preemptive  0000000000000000:0000000000000000 000000952fbd2e40 0     STA 
...
XXXX 9446    0 000000957a233410  8039820 Preemptive  0000000000000000:0000000000000000 000000952fbd2e40 0     MTA (Threadpool Completion Port) 
XXXX 9447    0 0000009579f83e30  8039820 Preemptive  0000000000000000:0000000000000000 000000952fbd2e40 0     MTA (Threadpool Completion Port) 
XXXX 9450    0 000000957a46dcf0  8039820 Preemptive  0000000000000000:0000000000000000 000000952fbd2e40 0     MTA (Threadpool Completion Port) 
XXXX 9449    0 000000957967c6e0  8039820 Preemptive  0000000000000000:0000000000000000 000000952fbd2e40 0     MTA (Threadpool Completion Port) 
XXXX 9448    0 000000957aee0010  8039820 Preemptive  0000000000000000:0000000000000000 000000952fbd2e40 0     MTA (Threadpool Completion Port) 
XXXX 9452    0 00000095796824a0  8039820 Preemptive  0000000000000000:0000000000000000 000000952fbd2e40 0     MTA (Threadpool Completion Port) 
XXXX 9451    0 000000957af05df0  8039820 Preemptive  0000000000000000:0000000000000000 000000952fbd2e40 0     MTA (Threadpool Completion Port)

這不看不知道，一看嚇一跳，當(dāng)前進(jìn)程有 9566 個(gè)，死線程高達(dá) 9471 個(gè) ，以過往經(jīng)驗(yàn)，這小子不用線程池，用 new Thread 咯, ?????? ，吐槽結(jié)束，再看下 Finalizer 線程正在做什么,使用 ~2s & !dumpstack

0:002> ~2s
ntdll!NtWaitForSingleObject+0xa:
00007ff8`8e220c8a c3              ret
0:002> !dumpstack
OS Thread Id: 0x41ce8 (2)
Current frame: ntdll!NtWaitForSingleObject+0xa
Child-SP         RetAddr          Caller, Callee
0000009549e4e120 00007ff88b591118 KERNELBASE!WaitForSingleObjectEx+0x94, calling ntdll!NtWaitForSingleObject
0000009549e4e1c0 00007ff88da3e334 combase!MTAThreadWaitForCall+0x54 [d:\9147\com\combase\dcomrem\channelb.cxx:5657], calling KERNELBASE!WaitForSingleObject
0000009549e4e210 00007ff88d8fe089 combase!MTAThreadDispatchCrossApartmentCall+0x75 [d:\9147\com\combase\dcomrem\chancont.cxx:193], calling combase!MTAThreadWaitForCall [d:\9147\com\combase\dcomrem\channelb.cxx:5619]
0000009549e4e240 00007ff88da3e13d combase!CRpcChannelBuffer::SendReceive2+0x64b [d:\9147\com\combase\dcomrem\channelb.cxx:4796], calling combase!MTAThreadDispatchCrossApartmentCall [d:\9147\com\combase\dcomrem\chancont.cxx:156]
0000009549e4e2b0 00007ff88e1bb6f7 ntdll!RtlAllocateHeap+0xd7, calling ntdll!RtlpLowFragHeapAllocFromContext
...
0000009549e4f5d0 00007ff8827d79cd clr!ManagedThreadBase_DispatchOuter+0x75, calling clr!ManagedThreadBase_DispatchMiddle
0000009549e4f5e0 00007ff8828601af clr!EEConfig::GetConfigDWORD_DontUse_+0x3b, calling clr!EEConfig::GetConfiguration_DontUse_
0000009549e4f660 00007ff8828574fa clr!FinalizerThread::FinalizerThreadStart+0x10a, calling clr!ManagedThreadBase_DispatchOuter
0000009549e4f6a0 00007ff8827d55b9 clr!EEHeapFreeInProcessHeap+0x45, calling kernel32!HeapFreeStub
0000009549e4f700 00007ff882882e8f clr!Thread::intermediateThreadProc+0x86
0000009549e4f780 00007ff882882e6f clr!Thread::intermediateThreadProc+0x66, calling clr!_chkstk
0000009549e4f7c0 00007ff88dcd13d2 kernel32!BaseThreadInitThunk+0x22
0000009549e4f7f0 00007ff88e2003c4 ntdll!RtlUserThreadStart+0x34

從堆棧信息看，原來是終結(jié)器線程卡死了，從 MTAThreadDispatchCrossApartmentCall方法看，貌似是 MTA 向 STA 做了一個(gè)調(diào)用，到這里有經(jīng)驗(yàn)的朋友應(yīng)該知道，這和 com 組件有關(guān)系了，也就是說 Finalizer 線程無法釋放由 STA 線程創(chuàng)建的 COM 對象，那到底是哪一個(gè)線程創(chuàng)建了沒有被合理釋放的 COM 組件呢？

4. 尋找創(chuàng)建 COM 組件的線程

說實(shí)話，這個(gè)對COM組件不了解的話，很難找出答案，但天無絕人之路，當(dāng)我回頭看 線程列表 的時(shí)候，發(fā)現(xiàn)居然有 38 個(gè) STA線程，截圖如下：

這里面肯定有問題，接下來抽一個(gè)線程看看調(diào)用棧如何。

0:004> !clrstack 
OS Thread Id: 0x41cb4 (4)
        Child SP               IP Call Site
000000954da1ee38 00007ff88e220c8a [HelperMethodFrame: 000000954da1ee38] System.Threading.Thread.SleepInternal(Int32)
000000954da1ef30 00007ff88138c20a *** WARNING: Unable to verify checksum for mscorlib.ni.dll
System.Threading.Thread.Sleep(Int32)
000000954da1ef60 00007ff82322437f xxx.CFileLogTask.DoWork()
000000954da1f160 00007ff8232234d6 xxx.CTask.InitStart()
000000954da1f240 00007ff8813c31d3 System.Threading.ExecutionContext.RunInternal(System.Threading.ExecutionContext, System.Threading.ContextCallback, System.Object, Boolean)
000000954da1f310 00007ff8813c3064 System.Threading.ExecutionContext.Run(System.Threading.ExecutionContext, System.Threading.ContextCallback, System.Object, Boolean)
000000954da1f340 00007ff8813c3032 System.Threading.ExecutionContext.Run(System.Threading.ExecutionContext, System.Threading.ContextCallback, System.Object)
000000954da1f390 00007ff8813bc812 System.Threading.ThreadHelper.ThreadStart()
000000954da1f5e8 00007ff8827d6bb3 [GCFrame: 000000954da1f5e8] 
000000954da1f938 00007ff8827d6bb3 [DebuggerU2MCatchHandlerFrame: 000000954da1f938]

接下來反編譯下 xxx.CFileLogTask.DoWork() 方法看看它是如何被 Thread 執(zhí)行的。

到這里終于水落石出，罪魁禍?zhǔn)自?nbsp;CurrThread.SetApartmentState(ApartmentState.STA); 這一句上，我也不知道為啥開個(gè) Thread 還要給個(gè) STA。。。

三：總結(jié)

本次事故主要是因?yàn)樵?STA 線程上用到了 COM 組件，導(dǎo)致讓 MTA 模型的 Finalizer 線程去釋放時(shí)被卡死，而這個(gè)Thread又沒有用 Application.Run 啟動(dòng)消息循環(huán)，STA也是 Sleep 狀態(tài)，我個(gè)人感覺兩者無法通訊，給到朋友的建議是去掉 Thread 的 STA。

其實(shí)這里有一個(gè)很好的點(diǎn)就是，當(dāng)內(nèi)存暴漲，不一定是 生產(chǎn)端 的問題，也有可能是 消費(fèi)端。

以上就是.NET某消防物聯(lián)網(wǎng)后臺服務(wù)內(nèi)存泄漏分析的詳細(xì)內(nèi)容，更多關(guān)于.NET后臺服務(wù)內(nèi)存泄漏的資料請關(guān)注腳本之家其它相關(guān)文章！

相關(guān)文章

最新評論