Android系統(tǒng)進(jìn)程間通信（IPC）機(jī)制Binder中的Client獲得Server遠(yuǎn)程接口過程源代碼分析
在上一篇文章中，我們分析了Android系統(tǒng)進(jìn)程間通信機(jī)制Binder中的Server在啟動(dòng)過程使用Service Manager的addService接口把自己添加到Service Manager守護(hù)過程中接受管理。在這一篇文章中，我們將深入到Binder驅(qū)動(dòng)程序源代碼去分析Client是如何通過Service Manager的getService接口中來獲得Server遠(yuǎn)程接口的。Client只有獲得了Server的遠(yuǎn)程接口之后，才能進(jìn)一步調(diào)用Server提供的服務(wù)。
這里，我們?nèi)匀皇峭ㄟ^Android系統(tǒng)中自帶的多媒體播放器為例子來說明Client是如何通過IServiceManager::getService接口來獲得MediaPlayerService這個(gè)Server的遠(yuǎn)程接口的。假設(shè)計(jì)讀者已經(jīng)閱讀過前面三篇文章淺談Service Manager成為Android進(jìn)程間通信（IPC）機(jī)制Binder守護(hù)進(jìn)程之路、淺談Android系統(tǒng)進(jìn)程間通信（IPC）機(jī)制Binder中的Server和Client獲得Service Manager接口之路和Android系統(tǒng)進(jìn)程間通信（IPC）機(jī)制Binder中的Server啟動(dòng)過程源代碼分析，即假設(shè)Service Manager和MediaPlayerService已經(jīng)啟動(dòng)完畢，Service Manager現(xiàn)在等待Client的請(qǐng)求。
這里，我們要舉例子說明的Client便是MediaPlayer了，它聲明和實(shí)現(xiàn)在frameworks/base/include/media/mediaplayer.h和frameworks/base/media/libmedia/mediaplayer.cpp文件中。MediaPlayer繼承于IMediaDeathNotifier類，這個(gè)類聲明和實(shí)現(xiàn)在frameworks/base/include/media/IMediaDeathNotifier.h和frameworks/base/media/libmedia//IMediaDeathNotifier.cpp文件中，里面有一個(gè)靜態(tài)成員函數(shù)getMeidaPlayerService，它通過IServiceManager::getService接口來獲得MediaPlayerService的遠(yuǎn)程接口。
在介紹IMediaDeathNotifier::getMeidaPlayerService函數(shù)之前，我們先了解一下這個(gè)函數(shù)的目標(biāo)?？磥砬懊?a target="_blank" href="http://www.dbjr.com.cn/article/91464.htm">淺談Android系統(tǒng)進(jìn)程間通信（IPC）機(jī)制Binder中的Server和Client獲得Service Manager接口之路這篇文章的讀者知道，我們?cè)讷@取Service Manager遠(yuǎn)程接口時(shí)，最終是獲得了一個(gè)BpServiceManager對(duì)象的IServiceManager接口。類似地，我們要獲得MediaPlayerService的遠(yuǎn)程接口，實(shí)際上就是要獲得一個(gè)稱為BpMediaPlayerService對(duì)象的IMediaPlayerService接口?，F(xiàn)在，我們就先來看一下BpMediaPlayerService的類圖：
從這個(gè)類圖可以看到，BpMediaPlayerService繼承于BpInterface<IMediaPlayerService>類，即BpMediaPlayerService繼承了IMediaPlayerService類和BpRefBase類，這兩個(gè)類又分別繼續(xù)了RefBase類。BpRefBase類有一個(gè)成員變量mRemote，它的類型為IBinder，實(shí)際是一個(gè)BpBinder對(duì)象。BpBinder類使用了IPCThreadState類來與Binder驅(qū)動(dòng)程序進(jìn)行交互，而IPCThreadState類有一個(gè)成員變量mProcess，它的類型為ProcessState，IPCThreadState類借助ProcessState類來打開Binder設(shè)備文件/dev/binder，因此，它可以和Binder驅(qū)動(dòng)程序進(jìn)行交互。
BpMediaPlayerService的構(gòu)造函數(shù)有一個(gè)參數(shù)impl，它的類型為const sp<IBinder>&，從上面的描述中，這個(gè)實(shí)際上就是一個(gè)BpBinder對(duì)象。這樣，要?jiǎng)?chuàng)建一個(gè)BpMediaPlayerService對(duì)象，首先就要有一個(gè)BpBinder對(duì)象。再來看BpBinder類的構(gòu)造函數(shù)，它有一個(gè)參數(shù)handle，類型為int32_t，這個(gè)參數(shù)的意義就是請(qǐng)求MediaPlayerService這個(gè)遠(yuǎn)程接口的進(jìn)程對(duì)MediaPlayerService這個(gè)Binder實(shí)體的引用了。因此，獲取MediaPlayerService這個(gè)遠(yuǎn)程接口的本質(zhì)問題就變?yōu)閺腟ervice Manager中獲得MediaPlayerService的一個(gè)句柄了。
現(xiàn)在，我們就來看一下IMediaDeathNotifier::getMeidaPlayerService的實(shí)現(xiàn)：
// establish binder interface to MediaPlayerService
/*static*/const sp<IMediaPlayerService>&
IMediaDeathNotifier::getMediaPlayerService()
{
LOGV("getMediaPlayerService");
Mutex::Autolock _l(sServiceLock);
if (sMediaPlayerService.get() == 0) {
sp<IServiceManager> sm = defaultServiceManager();
sp<IBinder> binder;
do {
binder = sm->getService(String16("media.player"));
if (binder != 0) {
break;
}
LOGW("Media player service not published, waiting...");
usleep(500000); // 0.5 s
} while(true);
if (sDeathNotifier == NULL) {
sDeathNotifier = new DeathNotifier();
}
binder->linkToDeath(sDeathNotifier);
sMediaPlayerService = interface_cast<IMediaPlayerService>(binder);
}
LOGE_IF(sMediaPlayerService == 0, "no media player service!?");
return sMediaPlayerService;
}
函數(shù)首先通過defaultServiceManager函數(shù)來獲得Service Manager的遠(yuǎn)程接口，實(shí)際上就是獲得BpServiceManager的IServiceManager接口，具體可以參考淺談Android系統(tǒng)進(jìn)程間通信（IPC）機(jī)制Binder中的Server和Client獲得Service Manager接口之路一文?？偟膩碚f，這里的語句：
sp<IServiceManager> sm = defaultServiceManager();
相當(dāng)于是：
sp<IServiceManager> sm = new BpServiceManager(new BpBinder(0));
這里的0表示Service Manager的遠(yuǎn)程接口的句柄值是0。
接下去的while循環(huán)是通過sm->getService接口來不斷嘗試獲得名稱為“media.player”的Service，即MediaPlayerService。為什么要通過這無窮循環(huán)來得MediaPlayerService呢？因?yàn)檫@時(shí)候MediaPlayerService可能還沒有啟動(dòng)起來，所以這里如果發(fā)現(xiàn)取回來的binder接口為NULL，就睡眠0.5秒，然后再嘗試獲取，這是獲取Service接口的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)做法。
我們來看一下BpServiceManager::getService的實(shí)現(xiàn)：
class BpServiceManager : public BpInterface<IServiceManager>
{
......
virtual sp<IBinder> getService(const String16& name) const
{
unsigned n;
for (n = 0; n < 5; n++){
sp<IBinder> svc = checkService(name);
if (svc != NULL) return svc;
LOGI("Waiting for service %s...\n", String8(name).string());
sleep(1);
}
return NULL;
}
virtual sp<IBinder> checkService( const String16& name) const
{
Parcel data, reply;
data.writeInterfaceToken(IServiceManager::getInterfaceDescriptor());
data.writeString16(name);
remote()->transact(CHECK_SERVICE_TRANSACTION, data, &reply);
return reply.readStrongBinder();
}
......
};
BpServiceManager::getService通過BpServiceManager::checkService執(zhí)行操作。
在BpServiceManager::checkService中，首先是通過Parcel::writeInterfaceToken往data寫入一個(gè)RPC頭，這個(gè)我們?cè)贏ndroid系統(tǒng)進(jìn)程間通信（IPC）機(jī)制Binder中的Server啟動(dòng)過程源代碼分析一文已經(jīng)介紹過了，就是寫往data里面寫入了一個(gè)整數(shù)和一個(gè)字符串“android.os.IServiceManager”， Service Manager來處理CHECK_SERVICE_TRANSACTION請(qǐng)求之前，會(huì)先驗(yàn)證一下這個(gè)RPC頭，看看是否正確。接著再往data寫入一個(gè)字符串name，這里就是“media.player”了。回憶一下Android系統(tǒng)進(jìn)程間通信（IPC）機(jī)制Binder中的Server啟動(dòng)過程源代碼分析這篇文章，那里已經(jīng)往Service Manager中注冊(cè)了一個(gè)名字為“media.player”的MediaPlayerService。
這里的remote()返回的是一個(gè)BpBinder，具體可以參考淺談Android系統(tǒng)進(jìn)程間通信（IPC）機(jī)制Binder中的Server和Client獲得Service Manager接口之路一文，于是，就進(jìn)行到BpBinder::transact函數(shù)了：
status_t BpBinder::transact(
uint32_t code, const Parcel& data, Parcel* reply, uint32_t flags)
{
// Once a binder has died, it will never come back to life.
if (mAlive) {
status_t status = IPCThreadState::self()->transact(
mHandle, code, data, reply, flags);
if (status == DEAD_OBJECT) mAlive = 0;
return status;
}
return DEAD_OBJECT;
}
這里的mHandle = 0，code = CHECK_SERVICE_TRANSACTION，flags = 0。
這里再進(jìn)入到IPCThread::transact函數(shù)中：
status_t IPCThreadState::transact(int32_t handle,
uint32_t code, const Parcel& data,
Parcel* reply, uint32_t flags)
{
status_t err = data.errorCheck();
flags |= TF_ACCEPT_FDS;
IF_LOG_TRANSACTIONS() {
TextOutput::Bundle _b(alog);
alog << "BC_TRANSACTION thr " << (void*)pthread_self() << " / hand "
<< handle << " / code " << TypeCode(code) << ": "
<< indent << data << dedent << endl;
}
if (err == NO_ERROR) {
LOG_ONEWAY(">>>> SEND from pid %d uid %d %s", getpid(), getuid(),
(flags & TF_ONE_WAY) == 0 ? "READ REPLY" : "ONE WAY");
err = writeTransactionData(BC_TRANSACTION, flags, handle, code, data, NULL);
}
if (err != NO_ERROR) {
if (reply) reply->setError(err);
return (mLastError = err);
}
if ((flags & TF_ONE_WAY) == 0) {
#if 0
if (code == 4) { // relayout
LOGI(">>>>>> CALLING transaction 4");
} else {
LOGI(">>>>>> CALLING transaction %d", code);
}
#endif
if (reply) {
err = waitForResponse(reply);
} else {
Parcel fakeReply;
err = waitForResponse(&fakeReply);
}
#if 0
if (code == 4) { // relayout
LOGI("<<<<<< RETURNING transaction 4");
} else {
LOGI("<<<<<< RETURNING transaction %d", code);
}
#endif
IF_LOG_TRANSACTIONS() {
TextOutput::Bundle _b(alog);
alog << "BR_REPLY thr " << (void*)pthread_self() << " / hand "
<< handle << ": ";
if (reply) alog << indent << *reply << dedent << endl;
else alog << "(none requested)" << endl;
}
} else {
err = waitForResponse(NULL, NULL);
}
return err;
}
首先是調(diào)用函數(shù)writeTransactionData寫入將要傳輸?shù)臄?shù)據(jù)到IPCThreadState的成員變量mOut中去：
status_t IPCThreadState::writeTransactionData(int32_t cmd, uint32_t binderFlags,
int32_t handle, uint32_t code, const Parcel& data, status_t* statusBuffer)
{
binder_transaction_data tr;
tr.target.handle = handle;
tr.code = code;
tr.flags = binderFlags;
const status_t err = data.errorCheck();
if (err == NO_ERROR) {
tr.data_size = data.ipcDataSize();
tr.data.ptr.buffer = data.ipcData();
tr.offsets_size = data.ipcObjectsCount()*sizeof(size_t);
tr.data.ptr.offsets = data.ipcObjects();
} else if (statusBuffer) {
tr.flags |= TF_STATUS_CODE;
*statusBuffer = err;
tr.data_size = sizeof(status_t);
tr.data.ptr.buffer = statusBuffer;
tr.offsets_size = 0;
tr.data.ptr.offsets = NULL;
} else {
return (mLastError = err);
}
mOut.writeInt32(cmd);
mOut.write(&tr, sizeof(tr));
return NO_ERROR;
}
結(jié)構(gòu)體binder_transaction_data在上一篇文章Android系統(tǒng)進(jìn)程間通信（IPC）機(jī)制Binder中的Server啟動(dòng)過程源代碼分析已經(jīng)介紹過，這里不再累述，這個(gè)結(jié)構(gòu)體是用來描述要傳輸?shù)膮?shù)的內(nèi)容的。這里著重描述一下將要傳輸?shù)膮?shù)tr里面的內(nèi)容，handle = 0，code = CHECK_SERVICE_TRANSACTION，cmd = BC_TRANSACTION，data里面的數(shù)據(jù)分別為：
writeInt32(IPCThreadState::self()->getStrictModePolicy() | STRICT_MODE_PENALTY_GATHER);
writeString16("android.os.IServiceManager");
writeString16("media.player");
這是在BpServiceManager::checkService函數(shù)里面寫進(jìn)去的，其中前兩個(gè)是RPC頭，Service Manager在收到這個(gè)請(qǐng)求時(shí)會(huì)驗(yàn)證這兩個(gè)參數(shù)是否正確，這點(diǎn)前面也提到了。IPCThread->getStrictModePolicy默認(rèn)返回0，STRICT_MODE_PENALTY_GATHER定義為：
// Note: must be kept in sync with android/os/StrictMode.java's PENALTY_GATHER
#define STRICT_MODE_PENALTY_GATHER 0x100
我們不關(guān)心這個(gè)參數(shù)的含義，這不會(huì)影響我們分析下面的源代碼，有興趣的讀者可以研究一下。這里要注意的是，要傳輸?shù)膮?shù)不包含有Binder對(duì)象，因此tr.offsets_size = 0。要傳輸?shù)膮?shù)最后寫入到IPCThreadState的成員變量mOut中，包括cmd和tr兩個(gè)數(shù)據(jù)。
回到IPCThread::transact函數(shù)中，由于(flags & TF_ONE_WAY) == 0為true，即這是一個(gè)同步請(qǐng)求，并且reply != NULL，
最終調(diào)用：
err = waitForResponse(reply);
進(jìn)入到waitForResponse函數(shù)中：
status_t IPCThreadState::waitForResponse(Parcel *reply, status_t *acquireResult)
{
int32_t cmd;
int32_t err;
while (1) {
if ((err=talkWithDriver()) < NO_ERROR) break;
err = mIn.errorCheck();
if (err < NO_ERROR) break;
if (mIn.dataAvail() == 0) continue;
cmd = mIn.readInt32();
IF_LOG_COMMANDS() {
alog << "Processing waitForResponse Command: "
<< getReturnString(cmd) << endl;
}
switch (cmd) {
case BR_TRANSACTION_COMPLETE:
if (!reply && !acquireResult) goto finish;
break;
case BR_DEAD_REPLY:
err = DEAD_OBJECT;
goto finish;
case BR_FAILED_REPLY:
err = FAILED_TRANSACTION;
goto finish;
case BR_ACQUIRE_RESULT:
{
LOG_ASSERT(acquireResult != NULL, "Unexpected brACQUIRE_RESULT");
const int32_t result = mIn.readInt32();
if (!acquireResult) continue;
*acquireResult = result ? NO_ERROR : INVALID_OPERATION;
}
goto finish;
case BR_REPLY:
{
binder_transaction_data tr;
err = mIn.read(&tr, sizeof(tr));
LOG_ASSERT(err == NO_ERROR, "Not enough command data for brREPLY");
if (err != NO_ERROR) goto finish;
if (reply) {
if ((tr.flags & TF_STATUS_CODE) == 0) {
reply->ipcSetDataReference(
reinterpret_cast<const uint8_t*>(tr.data.ptr.buffer),
tr.data_size,
reinterpret_cast<const size_t*>(tr.data.ptr.offsets),
tr.offsets_size/sizeof(size_t),
freeBuffer, this);
} else {
err = *static_cast<const status_t*>(tr.data.ptr.buffer);
freeBuffer(NULL,
reinterpret_cast<const uint8_t*>(tr.data.ptr.buffer),
tr.data_size,
reinterpret_cast<const size_t*>(tr.data.ptr.offsets),
tr.offsets_size/sizeof(size_t), this);
}
} else {
freeBuffer(NULL,
reinterpret_cast<const uint8_t*>(tr.data.ptr.buffer),
tr.data_size,
reinterpret_cast<const size_t*>(tr.data.ptr.offsets),
tr.offsets_size/sizeof(size_t), this);
continue;
}
}
goto finish;
default:
err = executeCommand(cmd);
if (err != NO_ERROR) goto finish;
break;
}
}
finish:
if (err != NO_ERROR) {
if (acquireResult) *acquireResult = err;
if (reply) reply->setError(err);
mLastError = err;
}
return err;
}
這個(gè)函數(shù)通過IPCThreadState::talkWithDriver與驅(qū)動(dòng)程序進(jìn)行交互：
status_t IPCThreadState::talkWithDriver(bool doReceive)
{
LOG_ASSERT(mProcess->mDriverFD >= 0, "Binder driver is not opened");
binder_write_read bwr;
// Is the read buffer empty?
const bool needRead = mIn.dataPosition() >= mIn.dataSize();
// We don't want to write anything if we are still reading
// from data left in the input buffer and the caller
// has requested to read the next data.
const size_t outAvail = (!doReceive || needRead) ? mOut.dataSize() : 0;
bwr.write_size = outAvail;
bwr.write_buffer = (long unsigned int)mOut.data();
// This is what we'll read.
if (doReceive && needRead) {
bwr.read_size = mIn.dataCapacity();
bwr.read_buffer = (long unsigned int)mIn.data();
} else {
bwr.read_size = 0;
}
......
// Return immediately if there is nothing to do.
if ((bwr.write_size == 0) && (bwr.read_size == 0)) return NO_ERROR;
bwr.write_consumed = 0;
bwr.read_consumed = 0;
status_t err;
do {
......
#if defined(HAVE_ANDROID_OS)
if (ioctl(mProcess->mDriverFD, BINDER_WRITE_READ, &bwr) >= 0)
err = NO_ERROR;
else
err = -errno;
#else
err = INVALID_OPERATION;
#endif
......
} while (err == -EINTR);
......
if (err >= NO_ERROR) {
if (bwr.write_consumed > 0) {
if (bwr.write_consumed < (ssize_t)mOut.dataSize())
mOut.remove(0, bwr.write_consumed);
else
mOut.setDataSize(0);
}
if (bwr.read_consumed > 0) {
mIn.setDataSize(bwr.read_consumed);
mIn.setDataPosition(0);
}
......
return NO_ERROR;
}
return err;
}
這里的needRead為true，因此，bwr.read_size大于0；outAvail也大于0，因此，bwr.write_size也大于0。函數(shù)最后通過：
ioctl(mProcess->mDriverFD, BINDER_WRITE_READ, &bwr)
進(jìn)入到Binder驅(qū)動(dòng)程序的binder_ioctl函數(shù)中。注意，這里的mProcess->mDriverFD是在我們前面調(diào)用defaultServiceManager函數(shù)獲得Service Manager遠(yuǎn)程接口時(shí)，打開的設(shè)備文件/dev/binder的文件描述符，mProcess是IPCSThreadState的成員變量。
Binder驅(qū)動(dòng)程序的binder_ioctl函數(shù)中，我們只關(guān)注BINDER_WRITE_READ命令相關(guān)的邏輯：
static long binder_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
{
int ret;
struct binder_proc *proc = filp->private_data;
struct binder_thread *thread;
unsigned int size = _IOC_SIZE(cmd);
void __user *ubuf = (void __user *)arg;
/*printk(KERN_INFO "binder_ioctl: %d:%d %x %lx\n", proc->pid, current->pid, cmd, arg);*/
ret = wait_event_interruptible(binder_user_error_wait, binder_stop_on_user_error < 2);
if (ret)
return ret;
mutex_lock(&binder_lock);
thread = binder_get_thread(proc);
if (thread == NULL) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto err;
}
switch (cmd) {
case BINDER_WRITE_READ: {
struct binder_write_read bwr;
if (size != sizeof(struct binder_write_read)) {
ret = -EINVAL;
goto err;
}
if (copy_from_user(&bwr, ubuf, sizeof(bwr))) {
ret = -EFAULT;
goto err;
}
if (binder_debug_mask & BINDER_DEBUG_READ_WRITE)
printk(KERN_INFO "binder: %d:%d write %ld at %08lx, read %ld at %08lx\n",
proc->pid, thread->pid, bwr.write_size, bwr.write_buffer, bwr.read_size, bwr.read_buffer);
if (bwr.write_size > 0) {
ret = binder_thread_write(proc, thread, (void __user *)bwr.write_buffer, bwr.write_size, &bwr.write_consumed);
if (ret < 0) {
bwr.read_consumed = 0;
if (copy_to_user(ubuf, &bwr, sizeof(bwr)))
ret = -EFAULT;
goto err;
}
}
if (bwr.read_size > 0) {
ret = binder_thread_read(proc, thread, (void __user *)bwr.read_buffer, bwr.read_size, &bwr.read_consumed, filp->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK);
if (!list_empty(&proc->todo))
wake_up_interruptible(&proc->wait);
if (ret < 0) {
if (copy_to_user(ubuf, &bwr, sizeof(bwr)))
ret = -EFAULT;
goto err;
}
}
if (binder_debug_mask & BINDER_DEBUG_READ_WRITE)
printk(KERN_INFO "binder: %d:%d wrote %ld of %ld, read return %ld of %ld\n",
proc->pid, thread->pid, bwr.write_consumed, bwr.write_size, bwr.read_consumed, bwr.read_size);
if (copy_to_user(ubuf, &bwr, sizeof(bwr))) {
ret = -EFAULT;
goto err;
}
break;
}
......
default:
ret = -EINVAL;
goto err;
}
ret = 0;
err:
......
return ret;
}
這里的filp->private_data的值是在defaultServiceManager函數(shù)創(chuàng)建ProcessState對(duì)象時(shí)，在ProcessState構(gòu)造函數(shù)通過open文件操作函數(shù)打開設(shè)備文件/dev/binder時(shí)設(shè)置好的，它表示的是調(diào)用open函數(shù)打開設(shè)備文件/dev/binder的進(jìn)程上下文信息，這里將它取出來保存在proc本地變量中。
這里的thread本地變量表示當(dāng)前線程上下文信息，通過binder_get_thread函數(shù)獲得。在前面執(zhí)行ProcessState構(gòu)造函數(shù)時(shí)，也會(huì)通過ioctl文件操作函數(shù)進(jìn)入到這個(gè)函數(shù)，那是第一次進(jìn)入到binder_ioctl這里，因此，調(diào)用binder_get_thread時(shí)，表示當(dāng)前進(jìn)程上下文信息的proc變量還沒有關(guān)于當(dāng)前線程的上下文信息，因此，會(huì)為proc創(chuàng)建一個(gè)表示當(dāng)前線程上下文信息的thread，會(huì)保存在proc->threads表示的紅黑樹結(jié)構(gòu)中。這里調(diào)用binder_get_thread就可以直接從proc找到并返回了。
進(jìn)入到BINDER_WRITE_READ相關(guān)的邏輯。先看看BINDER_WRITE_READ的定義：
#define BINDER_WRITE_READ _IOWR('b', 1, struct binder_write_read)
這里可以看出，BINDER_WRITE_READ命令的參數(shù)類型為struct binder_write_read：
struct binder_write_read {
signed long write_size; /* bytes to write */
signed long write_consumed; /* bytes consumed by driver */
unsigned long write_buffer;
signed long read_size; /* bytes to read */
signed long read_consumed; /* bytes consumed by driver */
unsigned long read_buffer;
};
這個(gè)結(jié)構(gòu)體的含義可以參考淺談Service Manager成為Android進(jìn)程間通信（IPC）機(jī)制Binder守護(hù)進(jìn)程之路一文。這里首先是通過copy_from_user函數(shù)把用戶傳進(jìn)來的參數(shù)的內(nèi)容拷貝到本地變量bwr中。
從上面的調(diào)用過程，我們知道，這里bwr.write_size是大于0的，因此進(jìn)入到binder_thread_write函數(shù)中，我們只關(guān)注BC_TRANSACTION相關(guān)的邏輯：
int
binder_thread_write(struct binder_proc *proc, struct binder_thread *thread,
void __user *buffer, int size, signed long *consumed)
{
uint32_t cmd;
void __user *ptr = buffer + *consumed;
void __user *end = buffer + size;
while (ptr < end && thread->return_error == BR_OK) {
if (get_user(cmd, (uint32_t __user *)ptr))
return -EFAULT;
ptr += sizeof(uint32_t);
if (_IOC_NR(cmd) < ARRAY_SIZE(binder_stats.bc)) {
binder_stats.bc[_IOC_NR(cmd)]++;
proc->stats.bc[_IOC_NR(cmd)]++;
thread->stats.bc[_IOC_NR(cmd)]++;
}
switch (cmd) {
......
case BC_TRANSACTION:
case BC_REPLY: {
struct binder_transaction_data tr;
if (copy_from_user(&tr, ptr, sizeof(tr)))
return -EFAULT;
ptr += sizeof(tr);
binder_transaction(proc, thread, &tr, cmd == BC_REPLY);
break;
}
......
default:
printk(KERN_ERR "binder: %d:%d unknown command %d\n", proc->pid, thread->pid, cmd);
return -EINVAL;
}
*consumed = ptr - buffer;
}
return 0;
}
這里再次把用戶傳出來的參數(shù)拷貝到本地變量tr中，tr的類型為struct binder_transaction_data，這個(gè)就是前面我們?cè)贗PCThreadState::writeTransactionData寫入的內(nèi)容了。
接著進(jìn)入到binder_transaction函數(shù)中，不相關(guān)的代碼我們忽略掉：
static void
binder_transaction(struct binder_proc *proc, struct binder_thread *thread,
struct binder_transaction_data *tr, int reply)
{
struct binder_transaction *t;
struct binder_work *tcomplete;
size_t *offp, *off_end;
struct binder_proc *target_proc;
struct binder_thread *target_thread = NULL;
struct binder_node *target_node = NULL;
struct list_head *target_list;
wait_queue_head_t *target_wait;
struct binder_transaction *in_reply_to = NULL;
struct binder_transaction_log_entry *e;
uint32_t return_error;
.......
if (reply) {
......
} else {
if (tr->target.handle) {
......
} else {
target_node = binder_context_mgr_node;
if (target_node == NULL) {
return_error = BR_DEAD_REPLY;
goto err_no_context_mgr_node;
}
}
......
target_proc = target_node->proc;
if (target_proc == NULL) {
return_error = BR_DEAD_REPLY;
goto err_dead_binder;
}
if (!(tr->flags & TF_ONE_WAY) && thread->transaction_stack) {
......
}
}
if (target_thread) {
......
} else {
target_list = &target_proc->todo;
target_wait = &target_proc->wait;
}
......
/* TODO: reuse incoming transaction for reply */
t = kzalloc(sizeof(*t), GFP_KERNEL);
if (t == NULL) {
return_error = BR_FAILED_REPLY;
goto err_alloc_t_failed;
}
binder_stats.obj_created[BINDER_STAT_TRANSACTION]++;
tcomplete = kzalloc(sizeof(*tcomplete), GFP_KERNEL);
if (tcomplete == NULL) {
return_error = BR_FAILED_REPLY;
goto err_alloc_tcomplete_failed;
}
binder_stats.obj_created[BINDER_STAT_TRANSACTION_COMPLETE]++;
t->debug_id = ++binder_last_id;
......
if (!reply && !(tr->flags & TF_ONE_WAY))
t->from = thread;
else
t->from = NULL;
t->sender_euid = proc->tsk->cred->euid;
t->to_proc = target_proc;
t->to_thread = target_thread;
t->code = tr->code;
t->flags = tr->flags;
t->priority = task_nice(current);
t->buffer = binder_alloc_buf(target_proc, tr->data_size,
tr->offsets_size, !reply && (t->flags & TF_ONE_WAY));
if (t->buffer == NULL) {
return_error = BR_FAILED_REPLY;
goto err_binder_alloc_buf_failed;
}
t->buffer->allow_user_free = 0;
t->buffer->debug_id = t->debug_id;
t->buffer->transaction = t;
t->buffer->target_node = target_node;
if (target_node)
binder_inc_node(target_node, 1, 0, NULL);
offp = (size_t *)(t->buffer->data + ALIGN(tr->data_size, sizeof(void *)));
if (copy_from_user(t->buffer->data, tr->data.ptr.buffer, tr->data_size)) {
......
return_error = BR_FAILED_REPLY;
goto err_copy_data_failed;
}
......
if (reply) {
......
} else if (!(t->flags & TF_ONE_WAY)) {
BUG_ON(t->buffer->async_transaction != 0);
t->need_reply = 1;
t->from_parent = thread->transaction_stack;
thread->transaction_stack = t;
} else {
......
}
t->work.type = BINDER_WORK_TRANSACTION;
list_add_tail(&t->work.entry, target_list);
tcomplete->type = BINDER_WORK_TRANSACTION_COMPLETE;
list_add_tail(&tcomplete->entry, &thread->todo);
if (target_wait)
wake_up_interruptible(target_wait);
return;
......
}
注意，這里的參數(shù)reply = 0，表示這是一個(gè)BC_TRANSACTION命令。
前面我們提到，傳給驅(qū)動(dòng)程序的handle值為0，即這里的tr->target.handle = 0，表示請(qǐng)求的目標(biāo)Binder對(duì)象是Service Manager，因此有：
target_node = binder_context_mgr_node; target_proc = target_node->proc; target_list = &target_proc->todo; target_wait = &target_proc->wait;
其中binder_context_mgr_node是在Service Manager通知Binder驅(qū)動(dòng)程序它是守護(hù)過程時(shí)創(chuàng)建的。
接著創(chuàng)建一個(gè)待完成事項(xiàng)tcomplete，它的類型為struct binder_work，這是等一會(huì)要保存在當(dāng)前線程的todo隊(duì)列去的，表示當(dāng)前線程有一個(gè)待完成的事務(wù)。緊跟著創(chuàng)建一個(gè)待處理事務(wù)t，它的類型為struct binder_transaction，這是等一會(huì)要存在到Service Manager的todo隊(duì)列去的，表示Service Manager當(dāng)前有一個(gè)事務(wù)需要處理。同時(shí)，這個(gè)待處理事務(wù)t也要存放在當(dāng)前線程的待完成事務(wù)transaction_stack列表中去：
t->from_parent = thread->transaction_stack;
thread->transaction_stack = t;
這樣表明當(dāng)前線程還有事務(wù)要處理。
繼續(xù)往下看，就是分別把tcomplete和t放在當(dāng)前線程thread和Service Manager進(jìn)程的todo隊(duì)列去了：
t->work.type = BINDER_WORK_TRANSACTION; list_add_tail(&t->work.entry, target_list); tcomplete->type = BINDER_WORK_TRANSACTION_COMPLETE; list_add_tail(&tcomplete->entry, &thread->todo);
最后，Service Manager有事情可做了，就要喚醒它了：
wake_up_interruptible(target_wait);
前面我們提到，此時(shí)Service Manager正在等待Client的請(qǐng)求，也就是Service Manager此時(shí)正在進(jìn)入到Binder驅(qū)動(dòng)程序的binder_thread_read函數(shù)中，并且休眠在target->wait上，具體參考淺談Service Manager成為Android進(jìn)程間通信（IPC）機(jī)制Binder守護(hù)進(jìn)程之路一文。
這里，我們暫時(shí)忽略Service Manager被喚醒之后的情景，繼續(xù)看當(dāng)前線程的執(zhí)行。
函數(shù)binder_transaction執(zhí)行完成之后，就一路返回到binder_ioctl函數(shù)里去了。函數(shù)binder_ioctl從binder_thread_write函數(shù)調(diào)用處返回后，發(fā)現(xiàn)bwr.read_size大于0，于是就進(jìn)入到binder_thread_read函數(shù)去了：
static int
binder_thread_read(struct binder_proc *proc, struct binder_thread *thread,
void __user *buffer, int size, signed long *consumed, int non_block)
{
void __user *ptr = buffer + *consumed;
void __user *end = buffer + size;
int ret = 0;
int wait_for_proc_work;
if (*consumed == 0) {
if (put_user(BR_NOOP, (uint32_t __user *)ptr))
return -EFAULT;
ptr += sizeof(uint32_t);
}
retry:
wait_for_proc_work = thread->transaction_stack == NULL && list_empty(&thread->todo);
......
if (wait_for_proc_work) {
......
} else {
if (non_block) {
if (!binder_has_thread_work(thread))
ret = -EAGAIN;
} else
ret = wait_event_interruptible(thread->wait, binder_has_thread_work(thread));
}
......
while (1) {
uint32_t cmd;
struct binder_transaction_data tr;
struct binder_work *w;
struct binder_transaction *t = NULL;
if (!list_empty(&thread->todo))
w = list_first_entry(&thread->todo, struct binder_work, entry);
else if (!list_empty(&proc->todo) && wait_for_proc_work)
w = list_first_entry(&proc->todo, struct binder_work, entry);
else {
if (ptr - buffer == 4 && !(thread->looper & BINDER_LOOPER_STATE_NEED_RETURN)) /* no data added */
goto retry;
break;
}
if (end - ptr < sizeof(tr) + 4)
break;
switch (w->type) {
......
case BINDER_WORK_TRANSACTION_COMPLETE: {
cmd = BR_TRANSACTION_COMPLETE;
if (put_user(cmd, (uint32_t __user *)ptr))
return -EFAULT;
ptr += sizeof(uint32_t);
binder_stat_br(proc, thread, cmd);
if (binder_debug_mask & BINDER_DEBUG_TRANSACTION_COMPLETE)
printk(KERN_INFO "binder: %d:%d BR_TRANSACTION_COMPLETE\n",
proc->pid, thread->pid);
list_del(&w->entry);
kfree(w);
binder_stats.obj_deleted[BINDER_STAT_TRANSACTION_COMPLETE]++;
} break;
......
}
if (!t)
continue;
......
}
done:
......
return 0;
}
函數(shù)首先是寫入一個(gè)操作碼BR_NOOP到用戶傳進(jìn)來的緩沖區(qū)中去。
回憶一下上面的binder_transaction函數(shù)，這里的thread->transaction_stack != NULL，并且thread->todo也不為空，所以線程不會(huì)進(jìn)入休眠狀態(tài)。
進(jìn)入while循環(huán)中，首先是從thread->todo隊(duì)列中取回待處理事項(xiàng)w，w的類型為BINDER_WORK_TRANSACTION_COMPLETE，這也是在binder_transaction函數(shù)里面設(shè)置的。對(duì)BINDER_WORK_TRANSACTION_COMPLETE的處理也很簡單，只是把一個(gè)操作碼BR_TRANSACTION_COMPLETE寫回到用戶傳進(jìn)來的緩沖區(qū)中去。這時(shí)候，用戶傳進(jìn)來的緩沖區(qū)就包含兩個(gè)操作碼了，分別是BR_NOOP和BINDER_WORK_TRANSACTION_COMPLETE。
binder_thread_read執(zhí)行完之后，返回到binder_ioctl函數(shù)中，將操作結(jié)果寫回到用戶空間中去：
if (copy_to_user(ubuf, &bwr, sizeof(bwr))) {
ret = -EFAULT;
goto err;
}
最后就返回到IPCThreadState::talkWithDriver函數(shù)中了。
IPCThreadState::talkWithDriver函數(shù)從下面語句：
ioctl(mProcess->mDriverFD, BINDER_WRITE_READ, &bwr)
返回后，首先是清空之前寫入Binder驅(qū)動(dòng)程序的內(nèi)容：
if (bwr.write_consumed > 0) {
if (bwr.write_consumed < (ssize_t)mOut.dataSize())
mOut.remove(0, bwr.write_consumed);
else
mOut.setDataSize(0);
}
接著是設(shè)置從Binder驅(qū)動(dòng)程序讀取的內(nèi)容：
if (bwr.read_consumed > 0) {
mIn.setDataSize(bwr.read_consumed);
mIn.setDataPosition(0);
}
然后就返回到IPCThreadState::waitForResponse去了。IPCThreadState::waitForResponse函數(shù)的處理也很簡單，就是處理剛才從Binder驅(qū)動(dòng)程序讀入內(nèi)容了。從前面的分析中，我們知道，從Binder驅(qū)動(dòng)程序讀入的內(nèi)容就是兩個(gè)整數(shù)了，分別是BR_NOOP和BR_TRANSACTION_COMPLETE。對(duì)BR_NOOP的處理很簡單，正如它的名字所示，什么也不做；而對(duì)BR_TRANSACTION_COMPLETE的處理，就分情況了，如果這個(gè)請(qǐng)求是異步的，那個(gè)整個(gè)BC_TRANSACTION操作就完成了，如果這個(gè)請(qǐng)求是同步的，即要等待回復(fù)的，也就是reply不為空，那么還要繼續(xù)通過IPCThreadState::talkWithDriver進(jìn)入到Binder驅(qū)動(dòng)程序中去等待BC_TRANSACTION操作的處理結(jié)果。
這里屬于后一種情況，于是再次通過IPCThreadState::talkWithDriver進(jìn)入到Binder驅(qū)動(dòng)程序的binder_ioctl函數(shù)中。不過這一次在binder_ioctl函數(shù)中，bwr.write_size等于0，而bwr.read_size大于0，于是再次進(jìn)入到binder_thread_read函數(shù)中。這時(shí)候thread->transaction_stack仍然不為NULL，不過thread->todo隊(duì)列已經(jīng)為空了，因?yàn)榍懊嫖覀円呀?jīng)處理過thread->todo隊(duì)列的內(nèi)容了，于是就通過下面語句：
ret = wait_event_interruptible(thread->wait, binder_has_thread_work(thread));
進(jìn)入休眠狀態(tài)了，等待Service Manager的喚醒。
現(xiàn)在，我們終于可以回到Service Manager被喚醒之后的過程了。前面我們說過，Service Manager此時(shí)正在binder_thread_read函數(shù)中休眠中：
static int
binder_thread_read(struct binder_proc *proc, struct binder_thread *thread,
void __user *buffer, int size, signed long *consumed, int non_block)
{
void __user *ptr = buffer + *consumed;
void __user *end = buffer + size;
int ret = 0;
int wait_for_proc_work;
if (*consumed == 0) {
if (put_user(BR_NOOP, (uint32_t __user *)ptr))
return -EFAULT;
ptr += sizeof(uint32_t);
}
retry:
wait_for_proc_work = thread->transaction_stack == NULL && list_empty(&thread->todo);
......
if (wait_for_proc_work) {
......
if (non_block) {
if (!binder_has_proc_work(proc, thread))
ret = -EAGAIN;
} else
ret = wait_event_interruptible_exclusive(proc->wait, binder_has_proc_work(proc, thread));
} else {
......
}
......
while (1) {
uint32_t cmd;
struct binder_transaction_data tr;
struct binder_work *w;
struct binder_transaction *t = NULL;
if (!list_empty(&thread->todo))
w = list_first_entry(&thread->todo, struct binder_work, entry);
else if (!list_empty(&proc->todo) && wait_for_proc_work)
w = list_first_entry(&proc->todo, struct binder_work, entry);
else {
if (ptr - buffer == 4 && !(thread->looper & BINDER_LOOPER_STATE_NEED_RETURN)) /* no data added */
goto retry;
break;
}
if (end - ptr < sizeof(tr) + 4)
break;
switch (w->type) {
case BINDER_WORK_TRANSACTION: {
t = container_of(w, struct binder_transaction, work);
} break;
......
}
if (!t)
continue;
BUG_ON(t->buffer == NULL);
if (t->buffer->target_node) {
struct binder_node *target_node = t->buffer->target_node;
tr.target.ptr = target_node->ptr;
tr.cookie = target_node->cookie;
t->saved_priority = task_nice(current);
if (t->priority < target_node->min_priority &&
!(t->flags & TF_ONE_WAY))
binder_set_nice(t->priority);
else if (!(t->flags & TF_ONE_WAY) ||
t->saved_priority > target_node->min_priority)
binder_set_nice(target_node->min_priority);
cmd = BR_TRANSACTION;
} else {
......
}
tr.code = t->code;
tr.flags = t->flags;
tr.sender_euid = t->sender_euid;
if (t->from) {
struct task_struct *sender = t->from->proc->tsk;
tr.sender_pid = task_tgid_nr_ns(sender, current->nsproxy->pid_ns);
} else {
......
}
tr.data_size = t->buffer->data_size;
tr.offsets_size = t->buffer->offsets_size;
tr.data.ptr.buffer = (void *)t->buffer->data + proc->user_buffer_offset;
tr.data.ptr.offsets = tr.data.ptr.buffer + ALIGN(t->buffer->data_size, sizeof(void *));
if (put_user(cmd, (uint32_t __user *)ptr))
return -EFAULT;
ptr += sizeof(uint32_t);
if (copy_to_user(ptr, &tr, sizeof(tr)))
return -EFAULT;
ptr += sizeof(tr);
......
list_del(&t->work.entry);
t->buffer->allow_user_free = 1;
if (cmd == BR_TRANSACTION && !(t->flags & TF_ONE_WAY)) {
t->to_parent = thread->transaction_stack;
t->to_thread = thread;
thread->transaction_stack = t;
} else {
......
}
break;
}
done:
*consumed = ptr - buffer;
......
return 0;
}
這里就是從語句中喚醒了：
ret = wait_event_interruptible_exclusive(proc->wait, binder_has_proc_work(proc, thread));
Service Manager喚醒過來看，繼續(xù)往下執(zhí)行，進(jìn)入到while循環(huán)中。首先是從proc->todo中取回待處理事項(xiàng)w。這個(gè)事項(xiàng)w的類型是BINDER_WORK_TRANSACTION，這是上面調(diào)用binder_transaction的時(shí)候設(shè)置的，于是通過w得到待處理事務(wù)t：
t = container_of(w, struct binder_transaction, work);
接下來的內(nèi)容，就把cmd和t->buffer的內(nèi)容拷貝到用戶傳進(jìn)來的緩沖區(qū)去了，這里就是Service Manager從用戶空間傳進(jìn)來的緩沖區(qū)了：
if (put_user(cmd, (uint32_t __user *)ptr)) return -EFAULT; ptr += sizeof(uint32_t); if (copy_to_user(ptr, &tr, sizeof(tr))) return -EFAULT; ptr += sizeof(tr);
注意，這里先是把t->buffer的內(nèi)容拷貝到本地變量tr中，再拷貝到用戶空間緩沖區(qū)去。關(guān)于t->buffer內(nèi)容的拷貝，請(qǐng)參考Android系統(tǒng)進(jìn)程間通信（IPC）機(jī)制Binder中的Server啟動(dòng)過程源代碼分析一文，它的一個(gè)關(guān)鍵地方是Binder驅(qū)動(dòng)程序和Service Manager守護(hù)進(jìn)程共享了同一個(gè)物理內(nèi)存的內(nèi)容，拷貝的只是這個(gè)物理內(nèi)存在用戶空間的虛擬地址回去：
tr.data.ptr.buffer = (void *)t->buffer->data + proc->user_buffer_offset;
tr.data.ptr.offsets = tr.data.ptr.buffer + ALIGN(t->buffer->data_size, sizeof(void *));
對(duì)于Binder驅(qū)動(dòng)程序這次操作來說，這個(gè)事項(xiàng)就算是處理完了，就要從todo隊(duì)列中刪除了：
list_del(&t->work.entry);
緊接著，還不放刪除這個(gè)事務(wù)，因?yàn)樗€要等待Service Manager處理完成后，再進(jìn)一步處理，因此，放在thread->transaction_stack隊(duì)列中：
t->to_parent = thread->transaction_stack;
t->to_thread = thread;
thread->transaction_stack = t;
還要注意的一個(gè)地方是，上面寫入的cmd = BR_TRANSACTION，告訴Service Manager守護(hù)進(jìn)程，它要做什么事情，后面我們會(huì)看到相應(yīng)的分析。
這樣，binder_thread_read函數(shù)就處理完了，回到binder_ioctl函數(shù)中，同樣是操作結(jié)果寫回到用戶空間的緩沖區(qū)中去：
if (copy_to_user(ubuf, &bwr, sizeof(bwr))) {
ret = -EFAULT;
goto err;
}
最后，就返回到frameworks/base/cmds/servicemanager/binder.c文件中的binder_loop函數(shù)去了：
void binder_loop(struct binder_state *bs, binder_handler func)
{
int res;
struct binder_write_read bwr;
unsigned readbuf[32];
bwr.write_size = 0;
bwr.write_consumed = 0;
bwr.write_buffer = 0;
readbuf[0] = BC_ENTER_LOOPER;
binder_write(bs, readbuf, sizeof(unsigned));
for (;;) {
bwr.read_size = sizeof(readbuf);
bwr.read_consumed = 0;
bwr.read_buffer = (unsigned) readbuf;
res = ioctl(bs->fd, BINDER_WRITE_READ, &bwr);
if (res < 0) {
LOGE("binder_loop: ioctl failed (%s)\n", strerror(errno));
break;
}
res = binder_parse(bs, 0, readbuf, bwr.read_consumed, func);
if (res == 0) {
LOGE("binder_loop: unexpected reply?!\n");
break;
}
if (res < 0) {
LOGE("binder_loop: io error %d %s\n", res, strerror(errno));
break;
}
}
}
這里就是從下面的語句：
res = ioctl(bs->fd, BINDER_WRITE_READ, &bwr);
返回來了。接著就進(jìn)入binder_parse函數(shù)處理從Binder驅(qū)動(dòng)程序里面讀取出來的數(shù)據(jù)：
int binder_parse(struct binder_state *bs, struct binder_io *bio,
uint32_t *ptr, uint32_t size, binder_handler func)
{
int r = 1;
uint32_t *end = ptr + (size / 4);
while (ptr < end) {
uint32_t cmd = *ptr++;
switch(cmd) {
......
case BR_TRANSACTION: {
struct binder_txn *txn = (void *) ptr;
......
if (func) {
unsigned rdata[256/4];
struct binder_io msg;
struct binder_io reply;
int res;
bio_init(&reply, rdata, sizeof(rdata), 4);
bio_init_from_txn(&msg, txn);
res = func(bs, txn, &msg, &reply);
binder_send_reply(bs, &reply, txn->data, res);
}
ptr += sizeof(*txn) / sizeof(uint32_t);
break;
}
......
default:
LOGE("parse: OOPS %d\n", cmd);
return -1;
}
}
return r;
}
前面我們說過，Binder驅(qū)動(dòng)程序?qū)懭氲接脩艨臻g的緩沖區(qū)中的cmd為BR_TRANSACTION，因此，這里我們只關(guān)注BR_TRANSACTION相關(guān)的邏輯。
這里用到的兩個(gè)數(shù)據(jù)結(jié)構(gòu)struct binder_txn和struct binder_io可以參考前面一篇文章Android系統(tǒng)進(jìn)程間通信（IPC）機(jī)制Binder中的Server啟動(dòng)過程源代碼分析，這里就不復(fù)述了。
接著往下看，函數(shù)調(diào)bio_init來初始化reply變量：
void bio_init(struct binder_io *bio, void *data,
uint32_t maxdata, uint32_t maxoffs)
{
uint32_t n = maxoffs * sizeof(uint32_t);
if (n > maxdata) {
bio->flags = BIO_F_OVERFLOW;
bio->data_avail = 0;
bio->offs_avail = 0;
return;
}
bio->data = bio->data0 = data + n;
bio->offs = bio->offs0 = data;
bio->data_avail = maxdata - n;
bio->offs_avail = maxoffs;
bio->flags = 0;
}
接著又調(diào)用bio_init_from_txn來初始化msg變量：
void bio_init_from_txn(struct binder_io *bio, struct binder_txn *txn)
{
bio->data = bio->data0 = txn->data;
bio->offs = bio->offs0 = txn->offs;
bio->data_avail = txn->data_size;
bio->offs_avail = txn->offs_size / 4;
bio->flags = BIO_F_SHARED;
}
最后，真正進(jìn)行處理的函數(shù)是從參數(shù)中傳進(jìn)來的函數(shù)指針func，這里就是定義在frameworks/base/cmds/servicemanager/service_manager.c文件中的svcmgr_handler函數(shù)：
int svcmgr_handler(struct binder_state *bs,
struct binder_txn *txn,
struct binder_io *msg,
struct binder_io *reply)
{
struct svcinfo *si;
uint16_t *s;
unsigned len;
void *ptr;
uint32_t strict_policy;
// LOGI("target=%p code=%d pid=%d uid=%d\n",
// txn->target, txn->code, txn->sender_pid, txn->sender_euid);
if (txn->target != svcmgr_handle)
return -1;
// Equivalent to Parcel::enforceInterface(), reading the RPC
// header with the strict mode policy mask and the interface name.
// Note that we ignore the strict_policy and don't propagate it
// further (since we do no outbound RPCs anyway).
strict_policy = bio_get_uint32(msg);
s = bio_get_string16(msg, &len);
if ((len != (sizeof(svcmgr_id) / 2)) ||
memcmp(svcmgr_id, s, sizeof(svcmgr_id))) {
fprintf(stderr,"invalid id %s\n", str8(s));
return -1;
}
switch(txn->code) {
case SVC_MGR_GET_SERVICE:
case SVC_MGR_CHECK_SERVICE:
s = bio_get_string16(msg, &len);
ptr = do_find_service(bs, s, len);
if (!ptr)
break;
bio_put_ref(reply, ptr);
return 0;
......
}
default:
LOGE("unknown code %d\n", txn->code);
return -1;
}
bio_put_uint32(reply, 0);
return 0;
}
這里， Service Manager要處理的code是SVC_MGR_CHECK_SERVICE，這是在前面的BpServiceManager::checkService函數(shù)里面設(shè)置的。
回憶一下，在BpServiceManager::checkService時(shí)，傳給Binder驅(qū)動(dòng)程序的參數(shù)為：
writeInt32(IPCThreadState::self()->getStrictModePolicy() | STRICT_MODE_PENALTY_GATHER);
writeString16("android.os.IServiceManager");
writeString16("media.player");
這里的語句：
strict_policy = bio_get_uint32(msg); s = bio_get_string16(msg, &len); s = bio_get_string16(msg, &len);
其中，會(huì)驗(yàn)證一下傳進(jìn)來的第二個(gè)參數(shù)，即"android.os.IServiceManager"是否正確，這個(gè)是驗(yàn)證RPC頭，注釋已經(jīng)說得很清楚了。
最后，就是調(diào)用do_find_service函數(shù)查找是存在名稱為"media.player"的服務(wù)了。回憶一下前面一篇文章Android系統(tǒng)進(jìn)程間通信（IPC）機(jī)制Binder中的Server啟動(dòng)過程源代碼分析，MediaPlayerService已經(jīng)把一個(gè)名稱為"media.player"的服務(wù)注冊(cè)到Service Manager中，所以這里一定能找到。我們看看do_find_service這個(gè)函數(shù)：
void *do_find_service(struct binder_state *bs, uint16_t *s, unsigned len)
{
struct svcinfo *si;
si = find_svc(s, len);
// LOGI("check_service('%s') ptr = %p\n", str8(s), si ? si->ptr : 0);
if (si && si->ptr) {
return si->ptr;
} else {
return 0;
}
}
這里又調(diào)用了find_svc函數(shù)：
struct svcinfo *find_svc(uint16_t *s16, unsigned len)
{
struct svcinfo *si;
for (si = svclist; si; si = si->next) {
if ((len == si->len) &&
!memcmp(s16, si->name, len * sizeof(uint16_t))) {
return si;
}
}
return 0;
}
就是在svclist列表中查找對(duì)應(yīng)名稱的svcinfo了。
然后返回到do_find_service函數(shù)中?；貞浺幌虑懊嬉黄恼翧ndroid系統(tǒng)進(jìn)程間通信（IPC）機(jī)制Binder中的Server啟動(dòng)過程源代碼分析，這里的si->ptr就是指MediaPlayerService這個(gè)Binder實(shí)體在Service Manager進(jìn)程中的句柄值了。
回到svcmgr_handler函數(shù)中，調(diào)用bio_put_ref函數(shù)將這個(gè)Binder引用寫回到reply參數(shù)。我們看看bio_put_ref的實(shí)現(xiàn)：
void bio_put_ref(struct binder_io *bio, void *ptr)
{
struct binder_object *obj;
if (ptr)
obj = bio_alloc_obj(bio);
else
obj = bio_alloc(bio, sizeof(*obj));
if (!obj)
return;
obj->flags = 0x7f | FLAT_BINDER_FLAG_ACCEPTS_FDS;
obj->type = BINDER_TYPE_HANDLE;
obj->pointer = ptr;
obj->cookie = 0;
}
這里很簡單，就是把一個(gè)類型為BINDER_TYPE_HANDLE的binder_object寫入到reply緩沖區(qū)中去。這里的binder_object就是相當(dāng)于是flat_binder_obj了，具體可以參考Android系統(tǒng)進(jìn)程間通信（IPC）機(jī)制Binder中的Server啟動(dòng)過程源代碼分析一文。
再回到svcmgr_handler函數(shù)中，最后，還寫入一個(gè)0值到reply緩沖區(qū)中，表示操作結(jié)果碼：
bio_put_uint32(reply, 0);
最后返回到binder_parse函數(shù)中，調(diào)用binder_send_reply函數(shù)將操作結(jié)果反饋給Binder驅(qū)動(dòng)程序：
void binder_send_reply(struct binder_state *bs,
struct binder_io *reply,
void *buffer_to_free,
int status)
{
struct {
uint32_t cmd_free;
void *buffer;
uint32_t cmd_reply;
struct binder_txn txn;
} __attribute__((packed)) data;
data.cmd_free = BC_FREE_BUFFER;
data.buffer = buffer_to_free;
data.cmd_reply = BC_REPLY;
data.txn.target = 0;
data.txn.cookie = 0;
data.txn.code = 0;
if (status) {
data.txn.flags = TF_STATUS_CODE;
data.txn.data_size = sizeof(int);
data.txn.offs_size = 0;
data.txn.data = &status;
data.txn.offs = 0;
} else {
data.txn.flags = 0;
data.txn.data_size = reply->data - reply->data0;
data.txn.offs_size = ((char*) reply->offs) - ((char*) reply->offs0);
data.txn.data = reply->data0;
data.txn.offs = reply->offs0;
}
binder_write(bs, &data, sizeof(data));
}
注意，這里的status參數(shù)為0。從這里可以看出，binder_send_reply告訴Binder驅(qū)動(dòng)程序執(zhí)行BC_FREE_BUFFER和BC_REPLY命令，前者釋放之前在binder_transaction分配的空間，地址為buffer_to_free，buffer_to_free這個(gè)地址是Binder驅(qū)動(dòng)程序把自己在內(nèi)核空間用的地址轉(zhuǎn)換成用戶空間地址再傳給Service Manager的，所以Binder驅(qū)動(dòng)程序拿到這個(gè)地址后，知道怎么樣釋放這個(gè)空間；后者告訴Binder驅(qū)動(dòng)程序，它的SVC_MGR_CHECK_SERVICE操作已經(jīng)完成了,要查詢的服務(wù)的句柄值也是保存在data.txn.data，操作結(jié)果碼是0，也是保存在data.txn.data中。
再來看binder_write函數(shù)：
int binder_write(struct binder_state *bs, void *data, unsigned len)
{
struct binder_write_read bwr;
int res;
bwr.write_size = len;
bwr.write_consumed = 0;
bwr.write_buffer = (unsigned) data;
bwr.read_size = 0;
bwr.read_consumed = 0;
bwr.read_buffer = 0;
res = ioctl(bs->fd, BINDER_WRITE_READ, &bwr);
if (res < 0) {
fprintf(stderr,"binder_write: ioctl failed (%s)\n",
strerror(errno));
}
return res;
}
這里可以看出，只有寫操作，沒有讀操作，即read_size為0。
這里又是一個(gè)ioctl的BINDER_WRITE_READ操作。直入到驅(qū)動(dòng)程序的binder_ioctl函數(shù)后，執(zhí)行BINDER_WRITE_READ命令，這里就不累述了。
最后，從binder_ioctl執(zhí)行到binder_thread_write函數(shù)，首先是執(zhí)行BC_FREE_BUFFER命令，這個(gè)命令的執(zhí)行在前面一篇文章Android系統(tǒng)進(jìn)程間通信（IPC）機(jī)制Binder中的Server啟動(dòng)過程源代碼分析已經(jīng)介紹過了，這里就不再累述了。
我們重點(diǎn)關(guān)注BC_REPLY命令的執(zhí)行：
int
binder_thread_write(struct binder_proc *proc, struct binder_thread *thread,
void __user *buffer, int size, signed long *consumed)
{
uint32_t cmd;
void __user *ptr = buffer + *consumed;
void __user *end = buffer + size;
while (ptr < end && thread->return_error == BR_OK) {
if (get_user(cmd, (uint32_t __user *)ptr))
return -EFAULT;
ptr += sizeof(uint32_t);
if (_IOC_NR(cmd) < ARRAY_SIZE(binder_stats.bc)) {
binder_stats.bc[_IOC_NR(cmd)]++;
proc->stats.bc[_IOC_NR(cmd)]++;
thread->stats.bc[_IOC_NR(cmd)]++;
}
switch (cmd) {
......
case BC_TRANSACTION:
case BC_REPLY: {
struct binder_transaction_data tr;
if (copy_from_user(&tr, ptr, sizeof(tr)))
return -EFAULT;
ptr += sizeof(tr);
binder_transaction(proc, thread, &tr, cmd == BC_REPLY);
break;
}
......
*consumed = ptr - buffer;
}
return 0;
}
又再次進(jìn)入到binder_transaction函數(shù)：
static void
binder_transaction(struct binder_proc *proc, struct binder_thread *thread,
struct binder_transaction_data *tr, int reply)
{
struct binder_transaction *t;
struct binder_work *tcomplete;
size_t *offp, *off_end;
struct binder_proc *target_proc;
struct binder_thread *target_thread = NULL;
struct binder_node *target_node = NULL;
struct list_head *target_list;
wait_queue_head_t *target_wait;
struct binder_transaction *in_reply_to = NULL;
struct binder_transaction_log_entry *e;
uint32_t return_error;
......
if (reply) {
in_reply_to = thread->transaction_stack;
if (in_reply_to == NULL) {
......
return_error = BR_FAILED_REPLY;
goto err_empty_call_stack;
}
......
thread->transaction_stack = in_reply_to->to_parent;
target_thread = in_reply_to->from;
......
target_proc = target_thread->proc;
} else {
......
}
if (target_thread) {
e->to_thread = target_thread->pid;
target_list = &target_thread->todo;
target_wait = &target_thread->wait;
} else {
......
}
/* TODO: reuse incoming transaction for reply */
t = kzalloc(sizeof(*t), GFP_KERNEL);
if (t == NULL) {
return_error = BR_FAILED_REPLY;
goto err_alloc_t_failed;
}
binder_stats.obj_created[BINDER_STAT_TRANSACTION]++;
tcomplete = kzalloc(sizeof(*tcomplete), GFP_KERNEL);
if (tcomplete == NULL) {
return_error = BR_FAILED_REPLY;
goto err_alloc_tcomplete_failed;
}
......
if (!reply && !(tr->flags & TF_ONE_WAY))
t->from = thread;
else
t->from = NULL;
t->sender_euid = proc->tsk->cred->euid;
t->to_proc = target_proc;
t->to_thread = target_thread;
t->code = tr->code;
t->flags = tr->flags;
t->priority = task_nice(current);
t->buffer = binder_alloc_buf(target_proc, tr->data_size,
tr->offsets_size, !reply && (t->flags & TF_ONE_WAY));
if (t->buffer == NULL) {
return_error = BR_FAILED_REPLY;
goto err_binder_alloc_buf_failed;
}
t->buffer->allow_user_free = 0;
t->buffer->debug_id = t->debug_id;
t->buffer->transaction = t;
t->buffer->target_node = target_node;
if (target_node)
binder_inc_node(target_node, 1, 0, NULL);
offp = (size_t *)(t->buffer->data + ALIGN(tr->data_size, sizeof(void *)));
if (copy_from_user(t->buffer->data, tr->data.ptr.buffer, tr->data_size)) {
binder_user_error("binder: %d:%d got transaction with invalid "
"data ptr\n", proc->pid, thread->pid);
return_error = BR_FAILED_REPLY;
goto err_copy_data_failed;
}
if (copy_from_user(offp, tr->data.ptr.offsets, tr->offsets_size)) {
binder_user_error("binder: %d:%d got transaction with invalid "
"offsets ptr\n", proc->pid, thread->pid);
return_error = BR_FAILED_REPLY;
goto err_copy_data_failed;
}
......
off_end = (void *)offp + tr->offsets_size;
for (; offp < off_end; offp++) {
struct flat_binder_object *fp;
......
fp = (struct flat_binder_object *)(t->buffer->data + *offp);
switch (fp->type) {
......
case BINDER_TYPE_HANDLE:
case BINDER_TYPE_WEAK_HANDLE: {
struct binder_ref *ref = binder_get_ref(proc, fp->handle);
if (ref == NULL) {
......
return_error = BR_FAILED_REPLY;
goto err_binder_get_ref_failed;
}
if (ref->node->proc == target_proc) {
......
} else {
struct binder_ref *new_ref;
new_ref = binder_get_ref_for_node(target_proc, ref->node);
if (new_ref == NULL) {
return_error = BR_FAILED_REPLY;
goto err_binder_get_ref_for_node_failed;
}
fp->handle = new_ref->desc;
binder_inc_ref(new_ref, fp->type == BINDER_TYPE_HANDLE, NULL);
......
}
} break;
......
}
}
if (reply) {
BUG_ON(t->buffer->async_transaction != 0);
binder_pop_transaction(target_thread, in_reply_to);
} else if (!(t->flags & TF_ONE_WAY)) {
......
} else {
......
}
t->work.type = BINDER_WORK_TRANSACTION;
list_add_tail(&t->work.entry, target_list);
tcomplete->type = BINDER_WORK_TRANSACTION_COMPLETE;
list_add_tail(&tcomplete->entry, &thread->todo);
if (target_wait)
wake_up_interruptible(target_wait);
return;
......
}
這次進(jìn)入binder_transaction函數(shù)的情形和上面介紹的binder_transaction函數(shù)的情形基本一致，只是這里的proc、thread和target_proc、target_thread調(diào)換了角色，這里的proc和thread指的是Service Manager進(jìn)程，而target_proc和target_thread指的是剛才請(qǐng)求SVC_MGR_CHECK_SERVICE的進(jìn)程。
那么，這次是如何找到target_proc和target_thread呢。首先，我們注意到，這里的reply等于1，其次，上面我們提到，Binder驅(qū)動(dòng)程序在喚醒Service Manager，告訴它有一個(gè)事務(wù)t要處理時(shí)，事務(wù)t雖然從Service Manager的todo隊(duì)列中刪除了，但是仍然保留在transaction_stack中。因此，這里可以從thread->transaction_stack找回這個(gè)等待回復(fù)的事務(wù)t，然后通過它找回target_proc和target_thread：
in_reply_to = thread->transaction_stack; target_thread = in_reply_to->from; target_list = &target_thread->todo; target_wait = &target_thread->wait;
再接著往下看，由于Service Manager返回來了一個(gè)Binder引用，所以這里要處理一下，就是中間的for循環(huán)了。這是一個(gè)BINDER_TYPE_HANDLE類型的Binder引用，這是前面設(shè)置的。先把t->buffer->data的內(nèi)容轉(zhuǎn)換為一個(gè)struct flat_binder_object對(duì)象fp，這里的fp->handle值就是這個(gè)Service在Service Manager進(jìn)程里面的引用值了。接通過調(diào)用binder_get_ref函數(shù)得到Binder引用對(duì)象struct binder_ref類型的對(duì)象ref：
struct binder_ref *ref = binder_get_ref(proc, fp->handle);
這里一定能找到，因?yàn)榍懊鍹ediaPlayerService執(zhí)行IServiceManager::addService的時(shí)候把自己添加到Service Manager的時(shí)候，會(huì)在Service Manager進(jìn)程中創(chuàng)建這個(gè)Binder引用，然后把這個(gè)Binder引用的句柄值返回給Service Manager用戶空間。
這里面的ref->node->proc不等于target_proc，因?yàn)檫@個(gè)Binder實(shí)體是屬于創(chuàng)建MediaPlayerService的進(jìn)程的，而不是請(qǐng)求這個(gè)服務(wù)的遠(yuǎn)程接口的進(jìn)程的，因此，這里調(diào)用binder_get_ref_for_node函數(shù)為這個(gè)Binder實(shí)體在target_proc創(chuàng)建一個(gè)引用：
struct binder_ref *new_ref; new_ref = binder_get_ref_for_node(target_proc, ref->node);
然后增加引用計(jì)數(shù)：
binder_inc_ref(new_ref, fp->type == BINDER_TYPE_HANDLE, NULL);
這樣，返回?cái)?shù)據(jù)中的Binder對(duì)象就處理完成了。注意，這里會(huì)把fp->handle的值改為在target_proc中的引用值：
fp->handle = new_ref->desc;
這里就相當(dāng)于是把t->buffer->data里面的Binder對(duì)象的句柄值改寫了。因?yàn)檫@是在另外一個(gè)不同的進(jìn)程里面的Binder引用，所以句柄值當(dāng)然要用新的了。這個(gè)值最終是要拷貝回target_proc進(jìn)程的用戶空間去的。
再往下看：
if (reply) {
BUG_ON(t->buffer->async_transaction != 0);
binder_pop_transaction(target_thread, in_reply_to);
} else if (!(t->flags & TF_ONE_WAY)) {
......
} else {
......
}
這里reply等于1，執(zhí)行binder_pop_transaction函數(shù)把當(dāng)前事務(wù)in_reply_to從target_thread->transaction_stack隊(duì)列中刪掉，這是上次調(diào)用binder_transaction函數(shù)的時(shí)候設(shè)置的，現(xiàn)在不需要了，所以把它刪掉。
再往后的邏輯就跟前面執(zhí)行binder_transaction函數(shù)時(shí)候一樣了，這里不再介紹。最后的結(jié)果就是喚醒請(qǐng)求SVC_MGR_CHECK_SERVICE操作的線程：
if (target_wait)
wake_up_interruptible(target_wait);
這樣，Service Manger回復(fù)調(diào)用SVC_MGR_CHECK_SERVICE請(qǐng)求就算完成了，重新回到frameworks/base/cmds/servicemanager/binder.c文件中的binder_loop函數(shù)等待下一個(gè)Client請(qǐng)求的到來。事實(shí)上，Service Manger回到binder_loop函數(shù)再次執(zhí)行ioctl函數(shù)時(shí)候，又會(huì)再次進(jìn)入到binder_thread_read函數(shù)。這時(shí)個(gè)會(huì)發(fā)現(xiàn)thread->todo不為空，這是因?yàn)閯偛盼覀冋{(diào)用了：
list_add_tail(&tcomplete->entry, &thread->todo);
把一個(gè)工作項(xiàng)tcompelete放在了在thread->todo中，這個(gè)tcompelete的type為BINDER_WORK_TRANSACTION_COMPLETE，因此，Binder驅(qū)動(dòng)程序會(huì)執(zhí)行下面操作：
switch (w->type) {
case BINDER_WORK_TRANSACTION_COMPLETE: {
cmd = BR_TRANSACTION_COMPLETE;
if (put_user(cmd, (uint32_t __user *)ptr))
return -EFAULT;
ptr += sizeof(uint32_t);
list_del(&w->entry);
kfree(w);
} break;
......
}
binder_loop函數(shù)執(zhí)行完這個(gè)ioctl調(diào)用后，才會(huì)在下一次調(diào)用ioctl進(jìn)入到Binder驅(qū)動(dòng)程序進(jìn)入休眠狀態(tài)，等待下一次Client的請(qǐng)求。
上面講到調(diào)用請(qǐng)求SVC_MGR_CHECK_SERVICE操作的線程被喚醒了，于是，重新執(zhí)行binder_thread_read函數(shù)：
static int
binder_thread_read(struct binder_proc *proc, struct binder_thread *thread,
void __user *buffer, int size, signed long *consumed, int non_block)
{
void __user *ptr = buffer + *consumed;
void __user *end = buffer + size;
int ret = 0;
int wait_for_proc_work;
if (*consumed == 0) {
if (put_user(BR_NOOP, (uint32_t __user *)ptr))
return -EFAULT;
ptr += sizeof(uint32_t);
}
retry:
wait_for_proc_work = thread->transaction_stack == NULL && list_empty(&thread->todo);
......
if (wait_for_proc_work) {
......
} else {
if (non_block) {
if (!binder_has_thread_work(thread))
ret = -EAGAIN;
} else
ret = wait_event_interruptible(thread->wait, binder_has_thread_work(thread));
}
......
while (1) {
uint32_t cmd;
struct binder_transaction_data tr;
struct binder_work *w;
struct binder_transaction *t = NULL;
if (!list_empty(&thread->todo))
w = list_first_entry(&thread->todo, struct binder_work, entry);
else if (!list_empty(&proc->todo) && wait_for_proc_work)
w = list_first_entry(&proc->todo, struct binder_work, entry);
else {
if (ptr - buffer == 4 && !(thread->looper & BINDER_LOOPER_STATE_NEED_RETURN)) /* no data added */
goto retry;
break;
}
......
switch (w->type) {
case BINDER_WORK_TRANSACTION: {
t = container_of(w, struct binder_transaction, work);
} break;
......
}
if (!t)
continue;
BUG_ON(t->buffer == NULL);
if (t->buffer->target_node) {
......
} else {
tr.target.ptr = NULL;
tr.cookie = NULL;
cmd = BR_REPLY;
}
tr.code = t->code;
tr.flags = t->flags;
tr.sender_euid = t->sender_euid;
if (t->from) {
......
} else {
tr.sender_pid = 0;
}
tr.data_size = t->buffer->data_size;
tr.offsets_size = t->buffer->offsets_size;
tr.data.ptr.buffer = (void *)t->buffer->data + proc->user_buffer_offset;
tr.data.ptr.offsets = tr.data.ptr.buffer + ALIGN(t->buffer->data_size, sizeof(void *));
if (put_user(cmd, (uint32_t __user *)ptr))
return -EFAULT;
ptr += sizeof(uint32_t);
if (copy_to_user(ptr, &tr, sizeof(tr)))
return -EFAULT;
ptr += sizeof(tr);
......
list_del(&t->work.entry);
t->buffer->allow_user_free = 1;
if (cmd == BR_TRANSACTION && !(t->flags & TF_ONE_WAY)) {
......
} else {
t->buffer->transaction = NULL;
kfree(t);
binder_stats.obj_deleted[BINDER_STAT_TRANSACTION]++;
}
break;
}
done:
......
return 0;
}
就是從下面這個(gè)調(diào)用：
ret = wait_event_interruptible(thread->wait, binder_has_thread_work(thread));
被喚醒過來了。在while循環(huán)中，從thread->todo得到w，w->type為BINDER_WORK_TRANSACTION，于是，得到t。從上面可以知道，Service Manager返回來了一個(gè)Binder引用和一個(gè)結(jié)果碼0回來，寫在t->buffer->data里面，現(xiàn)在把t->buffer->data加上proc->user_buffer_offset，得到用戶空間地址，保存在tr.data.ptr.buffer里面，這樣用戶空間就可以訪問這個(gè)數(shù)據(jù)了。由于cmd不等于BR_TRANSACTION，這時(shí)就可以把t刪除掉了，因?yàn)橐院蠖疾恍枰昧恕?br />
執(zhí)行完這個(gè)函數(shù)后，就返回到binder_ioctl函數(shù)，執(zhí)行下面語句，把數(shù)據(jù)返回給用戶空間：
if (copy_to_user(ubuf, &bwr, sizeof(bwr))) {
ret = -EFAULT;
goto err;
}
接著返回到用戶空間IPCThreadState::talkWithDriver函數(shù)，最后返回到IPCThreadState::waitForResponse函數(shù)，最終執(zhí)行到下面語句：
status_t IPCThreadState::waitForResponse(Parcel *reply, status_t *acquireResult)
{
int32_t cmd;
int32_t err;
while (1) {
if ((err=talkWithDriver()) < NO_ERROR) break;
......
cmd = mIn.readInt32();
......
switch (cmd) {
......
case BR_REPLY:
{
binder_transaction_data tr;
err = mIn.read(&tr, sizeof(tr));
LOG_ASSERT(err == NO_ERROR, "Not enough command data for brREPLY");
if (err != NO_ERROR) goto finish;
if (reply) {
if ((tr.flags & TF_STATUS_CODE) == 0) {
reply->ipcSetDataReference(
reinterpret_cast<const uint8_t*>(tr.data.ptr.buffer),
tr.data_size,
reinterpret_cast<const size_t*>(tr.data.ptr.offsets),
tr.offsets_size/sizeof(size_t),
freeBuffer, this);
} else {
......
}
} else {
......
}
}
goto finish;
......
}
}
finish:
......
return err;
}
注意，這里的tr.flags等于0，這個(gè)是在上面的binder_send_reply函數(shù)里設(shè)置的。接著就把結(jié)果保存在reply了：
reply->ipcSetDataReference( reinterpret_cast<const uint8_t*>(tr.data.ptr.buffer), tr.data_size, reinterpret_cast<const size_t*>(tr.data.ptr.offsets), tr.offsets_size/sizeof(size_t), freeBuffer, this);
我們簡單看一下Parcel::ipcSetDataReference函數(shù)的實(shí)現(xiàn)：
void Parcel::ipcSetDataReference(const uint8_t* data, size_t dataSize,
const size_t* objects, size_t objectsCount, release_func relFunc, void* relCookie)
{
freeDataNoInit();
mError = NO_ERROR;
mData = const_cast<uint8_t*>(data);
mDataSize = mDataCapacity = dataSize;
//LOGI("setDataReference Setting data size of %p to %lu (pid=%d)\n", this, mDataSize, getpid());
mDataPos = 0;
LOGV("setDataReference Setting data pos of %p to %d\n", this, mDataPos);
mObjects = const_cast<size_t*>(objects);
mObjectsSize = mObjectsCapacity = objectsCount;
mNextObjectHint = 0;
mOwner = relFunc;
mOwnerCookie = relCookie;
scanForFds();
}
上面提到，返回來的數(shù)據(jù)中有一個(gè)Binder引用，因此，這里的mObjectSize等于1，這個(gè)Binder引用對(duì)應(yīng)的位置記錄在mObjects成員變量中。
從這里層層返回，最后回到BpServiceManager::checkService函數(shù)中：
virtual sp<IBinder> BpServiceManager::checkService( const String16& name) const
{
Parcel data, reply;
data.writeInterfaceToken(IServiceManager::getInterfaceDescriptor());
data.writeString16(name);
remote()->transact(CHECK_SERVICE_TRANSACTION, data, &reply);
return reply.readStrongBinder();
}
這里就是從：
remote()->transact(CHECK_SERVICE_TRANSACTION, data, &reply);
返回來了。我們接著看一下reply.readStrongBinder函數(shù)的實(shí)現(xiàn)：
sp<IBinder> Parcel::readStrongBinder() const
{
sp<IBinder> val;
unflatten_binder(ProcessState::self(), *this, &val);
return val;
}
這里調(diào)用了unflatten_binder函數(shù)來構(gòu)造一個(gè)Binder對(duì)象：
status_t unflatten_binder(const sp<ProcessState>& proc,
const Parcel& in, sp<IBinder>* out)
{
const flat_binder_object* flat = in.readObject(false);
if (flat) {
switch (flat->type) {
case BINDER_TYPE_BINDER:
*out = static_cast<IBinder*>(flat->cookie);
return finish_unflatten_binder(NULL, *flat, in);
case BINDER_TYPE_HANDLE:
*out = proc->getStrongProxyForHandle(flat->handle);
return finish_unflatten_binder(
static_cast<BpBinder*>(out->get()), *flat, in);
}
}
return BAD_TYPE;
}
這里的flat->type是BINDER_TYPE_HANDLE，因此調(diào)用ProcessState::getStrongProxyForHandle函數(shù)：
sp<IBinder> ProcessState::getStrongProxyForHandle(int32_t handle)
{
sp<IBinder> result;
AutoMutex _l(mLock);
handle_entry* e = lookupHandleLocked(handle);
if (e != NULL) {
// We need to create a new BpBinder if there isn't currently one, OR we
// are unable to acquire a weak reference on this current one. See comment
// in getWeakProxyForHandle() for more info about this.
IBinder* b = e->binder;
if (b == NULL || !e->refs->attemptIncWeak(this)) {
b = new BpBinder(handle);
e->binder = b;
if (b) e->refs = b->getWeakRefs();
result = b;
} else {
// This little bit of nastyness is to allow us to add a primary
// reference to the remote proxy when this team doesn't have one
// but another team is sending the handle to us.
result.force_set(b);
e->refs->decWeak(this);
}
}
return result;
}
這里我們可以看到，ProcessState會(huì)把使用過的Binder遠(yuǎn)程接口（BpBinder）緩存起來，這樣下次從Service Manager那里請(qǐng)求得到相同的句柄（Handle）時(shí)就可以直接返回這個(gè)Binder遠(yuǎn)程接口了，不用再創(chuàng)建一個(gè)出來。這里是第一次使用，因此，e->binder為空，于是創(chuàng)建了一個(gè)BpBinder對(duì)象：
b = new BpBinder(handle); e->binder = b; if (b) e->refs = b->getWeakRefs(); result = b;
最后，函數(shù)返回到IMediaDeathNotifier::getMediaPlayerService這里，從這個(gè)語句返回：
binder = sm->getService(String16("media.player"));
這里，就相當(dāng)于是：
binder = new BpBinder(handle);
最后，函數(shù)調(diào)用：
sMediaPlayerService = interface_cast<IMediaPlayerService>(binder);
到了這里，我們可以參考一下前面一篇文章淺談Android系統(tǒng)進(jìn)程間通信（IPC）機(jī)制Binder中的Server和Client獲得Service Manager，就會(huì)知道，這里的interface_cast實(shí)際上最終調(diào)用了IMediaPlayerService::asInterface函數(shù)：
android::sp<IMediaPlayerService> IMediaPlayerService::asInterface(const android::sp<android::IBinder>& obj)
{
android::sp<IServiceManager> intr;
if (obj != NULL) {
intr = static_cast<IMediaPlayerService*>(
obj->queryLocalInterface(IMediaPlayerService::descriptor).get());
if (intr == NULL) {
intr = new BpMediaPlayerService(obj);
}
}
return intr;
}
這里的obj就是BpBinder，而BpBinder::queryLocalInterface返回NULL，因此就創(chuàng)建了一個(gè)BpMediaPlayerService對(duì)象：
intr = new BpMediaPlayerService(new BpBinder(handle));
因此，我們最終就得到了一個(gè)BpMediaPlayerService對(duì)象，達(dá)到我們最初的目標(biāo)。
有了這個(gè)BpMediaPlayerService這個(gè)遠(yuǎn)程接口之后，MediaPlayer就可以調(diào)用MediaPlayerService的服務(wù)了。
至此，Android系統(tǒng)進(jìn)程間通信（IPC）機(jī)制Binder中的Client如何通過Service Manager的getService函數(shù)獲得Server遠(yuǎn)程接口的過程就分析完了，Binder機(jī)制的學(xué)習(xí)就暫告一段落了。
不過，細(xì)心的讀者可能會(huì)發(fā)現(xiàn)，我們這里介紹的Binder機(jī)制都是基于C/C++語言實(shí)現(xiàn)的，但是我們?cè)诰帉憫?yīng)用程序都是基于Java語言的，那么，我們?nèi)绾问褂肑ava語言來使用系統(tǒng)的Binder機(jī)制來進(jìn)行進(jìn)程間通信呢？這就是下一篇文章要介紹的內(nèi)容了，敬請(qǐng)關(guān)注。
以上就是對(duì)Android IPC Binder Client獲得Server 遠(yuǎn)程接口過程的源碼分析，后續(xù)繼續(xù)補(bǔ)充相關(guān)文章，謝謝大家對(duì)本站的支持！
- Android 圖文詳解Binder進(jìn)程通信底層原理
- Android通過繼承Binder類實(shí)現(xiàn)多進(jìn)程通信
- Android系統(tǒng)進(jìn)程間通信Binder機(jī)制在應(yīng)用程序框架層的Java接口源代碼分析
- Android系統(tǒng)進(jìn)程間通信（IPC）機(jī)制Binder中的Server啟動(dòng)過程源代碼分析
- Android系統(tǒng)進(jìn)程間通信（IPC）機(jī)制Binder中的Server和Client獲得Service Manager接口之路
- Android Binder 通信原理圖文詳解
相關(guān)文章
在不同Activity之間傳遞數(shù)據(jù)的四種常用方法
這篇文章主要介紹了在不同Activity之間傳遞數(shù)據(jù)的四種常用方法 的相關(guān)資料,需要的朋友可以參考下2016-03-03
Android 中TextView中跑馬燈效果的實(shí)現(xiàn)方法
這篇文章主要介紹了Android 中TextView中跑馬燈效果的實(shí)現(xiàn)方法,非常不錯(cuò)，具有參考借鑒價(jià)值，需要的朋友可以參考下2017-02-02
這篇文章主要介紹了Activity生命周期與啟動(dòng)模式圖文解說，內(nèi)容比較詳細(xì)，具有一定參考價(jià)值，需要的朋友可以了解下。2017-11-11
這篇文章主要介紹了Android仿微信實(shí)現(xiàn)下拉列表的相關(guān)資料,需要的朋友可以參考下2015-12-12
這篇文章主要為大家詳細(xì)介紹了Android實(shí)現(xiàn)音頻錄音與播放，文中示例代碼介紹的非常詳細(xì)，具有一定的參考價(jià)值，感興趣的小伙伴們可以參考一下2022-08-08
使用adb命令向Android模擬器中導(dǎo)入通訊錄聯(lián)系人的方法
這篇文章主要介紹了使用adb命令向Android模擬器中導(dǎo)入通訊錄聯(lián)系人的方法,實(shí)例分析了導(dǎo)入通訊錄存儲(chǔ)文件的技巧,需要的朋友可以參考下2015-01-01
這篇文章主要介紹了Android seekbar（自定義）控制音量同步更新的相關(guān)資料,需要的朋友可以參考下2017-01-01
Android基于ListView實(shí)現(xiàn)類似Market分頁加載效果示例
這篇文章主要介紹了Android基于ListView實(shí)現(xiàn)類似Market分頁加載效果,結(jié)合完整實(shí)例形式分析了ListView的OnScroll方法來實(shí)現(xiàn)分頁與滾動(dòng)加載的操作步驟與相關(guān)實(shí)現(xiàn)技巧,需要的朋友可以參考下2016-10-10
增量更新根據(jù)字面理解就是下載增加的那部分來達(dá)到更新的目獲取舊的Apk安裝包的簽名和已合并成新的Apk安裝包的簽名，對(duì)比簽名是否一致當(dāng)你下載差異文件時(shí)，可以讓服務(wù)器給你返回新的Apk合并成功后文件的md5，當(dāng)你合并成功后，通過校驗(yàn)文件的md5值，達(dá)到校驗(yàn)文件完整性。2016-04-04
Android實(shí)現(xiàn)獲取未接來電和未讀短信數(shù)量的方法
這篇文章主要介紹了Android實(shí)現(xiàn)獲取未接來電和未讀短信數(shù)量的方法,是Android程序開發(fā)中非常常見的重要功能,需要的朋友可以參考下2014-08-08